Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41564335›Full record

Trial reportJMIR mHealth and uHealth2026

Efficacy of a Digital Peer Support Program on Weight Management and Mental Health in University Students With Preobesity: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Xingyu Liu, Ting Liu, Tao Chen, Ruisi Ma

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xingyu LiuBadminton Technical and Tactical Analysis and Diagnostic Laboratory, National Academy of Badminton, Guangzhou Sport University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0009-0009-1540-8213
Ting LiuSchool of Nursing, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8248-2968
Tao Chen *Badminton Technical and Tactical Analysis and Diagnostic Laboratory, National Academy of Badminton, Guangzhou Sport University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0009-0006-3750-1804
Ruisi Ma *School of Physical Education, Jinan University, No. 601 Huangpu Avenue West, Tianhe District, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510632, China, 86 13828466636.ORCID 0000-0002-0460-7243

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Approximately one-third of university students are overweight or obese, and a similar proportion experience anxiety or depression. Despite the interrelated nature of weight and mental health, interventions rarely address these issues simultaneously in young adults. Digital peer support interventions have the potential to promote healthy lifestyle and mental well-being. However, evidence is limited on whether a digital peer-driven approach can concurrently improve weight management and mental health in university populations with preobesity. Objective: This randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluated the efficacy of a digital peer support program in concurrently improving weight management and mental health outcomes among university students with preobesity. Methods: In a single-blind parallel group RCT, 216 students with preobesity were allocated equally among three 6-month arms, which were a peer support intervention, an active wellness control, and a waitlist control. The peer support arm began with an interactive online workshop followed by moderated WeChat (Tencent) group discussions, daily micro tasks, biweekly group challenges, and digital badges to reinforce engagement. The active control group received the same schedule and formats but focused on general wellness topics. The waitlist group completed the same assessments without any intervention during the study period. The primary outcome measured the change in BMI from baseline to 6 months. Secondary outcomes included weekly physical activity measured in metabolic equivalent of task minutes, self-esteem, loneliness, anxiety, and depression assessed at 0, 2, 4, and 6 months. Analyses used linear mixed effects models. Results: Retention exceeded 90%. At 6 months, the peer-support group achieved a greater BMI reduction than the active control by 0.47 (95% CI -0.89 to -0.04) kg/m² and waitlist by 0.54 (95% CI -0.85 to -0.01) kg/m². Weekly metabolic equivalent of task-minutes was 129.5 higher than active control (95% CI 53.3-205.6) and 152.9 higher than waitlist (95% CI 68.4-237.4). Self-esteem increased by 1.81 points versus active control (95% CI 0.22-3.39) and 1.99 points versus waitlist (95% CI 0.21-3.76). Loneliness scores fell by 3.79 points relative to active control (95% CI -7.03 to -0.56) and by 5.02 points relative to waitlist (95% CI -8.38 to -1.66). No significant differences emerged for anxiety or depression. Conclusions: A comprehensive digital peer-support program delivered via WeChat produced modest but clinically meaningful improvements in weight management, physical activity, self-esteem, and social connectedness among undergraduates with preobesity compared with wellness control and no intervention. These findings suggest that integrating peer support into scalable digital platforms can simultaneously address physical and psychosocial health in at-risk university populations.

Indexed as

Peer GroupStudentsAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMental HealthObesitySingle-Blind MethodSocial SupportUniversitiesYoung Adultdigital peer supportmental healthpreobeserandomized controlled trialuniversity studentsweight management

Identifiers

PMID41564335
PMCPMC12823021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.