ArticleJMIR formative research2026
Evaluation of a Novel Web-Based Active Learning Tool for Primary Care Physicians' Continuing Professional Development (The Community Fracture Capture Learning Hub): Quantitative Analysis.
Article in JMIR formative research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Primary Care Physicians' Interactions With a Novel Web-Based Active Learning Tool (The Community Fracture Capture Learning Hub): Qualitative Analysis.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Moderators' Role in Fostering Health Practitioner Engagement Within an Online Active Learning Program (The Community Fracture Capture Learning Hub): Qualitative Relational Content Thematic Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The lack of osteoporosis treatment initiation following fragility fractures is a recognized gap, particularly in primary care. Primary care physicians' (PCPs) barriers to treatment, such as uncertainties in investigation, initiation, and concerns about drug side effects, remain challenging. It is also unclear whether knowledge gaps and barriers vary by region or if active learning platforms are more effective than passive methods in improving treatment rates, and how PCP demographics influence learning outcomes. With time constraints, PCPs are increasingly using online platforms for continuing professional development, and the interactive online Community Fracture Capture (CFC) tool has emerged as a promising alternative to traditional methods. Our CFC pilot study tested this program's design and content, revealing its potential effectiveness. Objective: The study aimed to assess the operational characteristics, educational effectiveness, and acceptability of the interactive online CFC model in enhancing Australian PCPs' knowledge and skills in community-based fracture treatment. Additionally, it sought to examine how PCPs' knowledge and treatment gaps relate to their demographic characteristics and clinical practice backgrounds. Methods: The CFC Learning Hub is a secure, adaptable online platform that promotes community learning. It includes an interactive forum where participants share case studies and engage in discussions with bone specialists and senior PCP facilitators. The hub also offers a knowledge repository and allows participants to post inquiries. Online surveys and back-end analytics track baseline knowledge, activity levels, and improvements in knowledge and confidence over time, offering insights into participants' learning and program development. Results: Four 6-week small-group cycles involved 55 PCPs, with over 80% working in metropolitan-based practices and a median (IQR) of 22 (16-34) years in practice. Topic modules covered osteoporosis diagnostics, treatment, monitoring, and challenging conditions, using a multidisciplinary approach with participant case studies. A total of 35 (64%) PCPs provided evaluation data, with 86% (n=30) joining to learn from experts or improve patient management and 83% (n=29) being satisfied with the content. Preferred learning methods included small group learning (n=13, 37%), live webinars (n=9, 26%), interactive learning (n=7, 20%), and on-demand videos (n=6, 17%), and 57% (n=20) found the platform easy to use. The most popular access times were evening (n= 23, 66%) and weekends (n=10, 29%). At completion, 89% (n=31) would recommend the training, and 78% (n=22 out of 28 respondents to the postprogram expectations meeting survey) were fully satisfied that their training needs were met, with 22% (n=6) partly satisfied. In addition, following the course completion, almost everyone reported being confident or very confident in managing osteoporosis. Conclusions: The CFC program was created by bone specialists, PCPs, software engineers, and information technology specialists. This collaboration produced a user-friendly, case-based, interactive, time-flexible, and highly acceptable program bridging investigation and management gaps in osteoporosis. It is customized to address challenges faced by PCPs and is potentially relevant for implementation in a wide range of fields, both health-related and others.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.