Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41564274›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of urology2026

First-In-Human Assessment of the UroActive Electronic Artificial Urinary Sphincter for Treating Male Patients with Stress Urinary Incontinence.

Pierre Mozer, Aurelien Beaugerie, Marie-Aimée Perrouin-Verbe, Anne Denormandie, Juliette Cotte, Caroline Plassais, Stéphanie Tran, Dan Elliott, Emmanuel Chartier-Kastler

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Pierre MozerSorbonne Université, Hôpital Universitaire Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3525-388X
Aurelien BeaugerieSorbonne Université, Hôpital Universitaire Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Marie-Aimée Perrouin-VerbeUrology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, Nantes Université, Nantes, France.
Anne DenormandieSorbonne Université, Hôpital Universitaire Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Juliette CotteSorbonne Université, Hôpital Universitaire Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Caroline PlassaisSorbonne Université, Hôpital Universitaire Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Stéphanie TranSorbonne Université, Hôpital Universitaire Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Dan ElliottDepartment of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Emmanuel Chartier-KastlerSorbonne Université, Hôpital Universitaire Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4241-8125

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy during the first year of use of the UroActive device in male patients with stress urinary incontinence. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis prospective, multicenter, single-arm, first-in-human study enrolled 6 male patients with bothersome stress urinary incontinence unresponsive to conservative or surgical treatments. After UroActive implantation, follow-up was planned for 5 years (postactivation). Study end points included successful device activation, revision, and explantation rates. Other end points assessed 24 hours pad-weight test reduction, pad usage, uroflowmetry, postvoid residual urine, and patient-reported outcomes (International Consultation Incontinence Questionnaires UI Short Form, EQ-5D, I-QOL, Urinary Symptom Profile). Adverse events were collected throughout the study.

resultsAll 6 patients underwent successful implantation and device activation (100%). No explants or revisions were required during the 365 days postactivation. At 365 days postactivation, the pad weight was reduced by ≥ 50% in all patients and reduced by ≥ 75% in 5 (83.3%). The median pad use decreased from 3.7 to 1.0 pad per day. Uroflowmetry remained within acceptable ranges, and postvoid residual urine was minimal. Quality of life scores significantly improved across all instruments. Nine device deficiencies were reported, all involving the patient remote control. No unanticipated serious adverse events occurred.

conclusionsIn men with stress urinary incontinence, the UroActive device demonstrates promising feasibility, safety, and functional outcomes during the 365 days postactivation. Patients experienced substantial symptom improvement and high satisfaction, with no surgical revisions. Larger studies with extended follow-up are needed to confirm these findings and assess long-term device performance.

Indexed as

Urinary Incontinence, StressUrinary Sphincter, ArtificialAgedFeasibility StudiesFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesProsthesis DesignProsthesis ImplantationTreatment Outcomeartificial urinary sphincterprostatestress urinary incontinence

Identifiers

PMID41564274
PMCPMC13258104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.