ArticlePloS one2026
Age-specific impact of COVID-19 on birth rates in Japan: An interrupted time-series analysis using national vital statistics.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesA study investigating the impact of COVID-19 on birth rates across women's age groups has not been previously conducted in Japan. Therefore, we examined this issue using national birth data.
methodsThe analysis utilized monthly live birth data from the Vital Statistics from 2015 to 2023, which were accessed on July 27, 2025. We estimated the expected number of births in the post-pandemic period through quasi-Poisson regression analysis and calculated the ratios of the sum of actual births to that of predicted births for each women's age group. In addition, a segmented regression analysis was performed to assess the effect of the pandemic on birth rates, focusing on changes in level and trend across age groups.
resultsThe ratios of the sum of actual births to that of predicted births in the post-pandemic period was close to one overall, but actual numbers were significantly lower than predicted numbers in women aged 15-19, 20-24, 25-29, and 35-39 years. Segmented regression analysis revealed significant declines in birth rates among women aged 15-19, 20-24, and 45-49 years due to the pandemic, with the rate ratios (RRs) being 0.880 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.828, 0.935), 0.936 (95%CI: 0.907, 0.967), and 0.890 (95%CI: 0.824, 0.961), respectively, indicating that an immediate effect of the pandemic was evident in those age groups. In addition, significant trend changes were observed among women aged 20-24, 25-29, 35-39, and 45-49 years, with the RRs being 0.995 (95%CI: 0.993, 0.996), 0.998 (95%CI: 0.996, 0.999), 0.998 (95%CI: 0.997, 1.000), and 1.004 (95%CI: 1.001, 1.008), respectively, indicating an acceleration of the declining trend in some age groups.
conclusionsThese findings suggest that the pandemic's effect on birth rates varies by women's age, with a more pronounced decrease among younger women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.