ArticlePloS one2026
Weathering the storm of COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional survey of reported changes in first contact physiotherapy services in the UK and Australia.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Rapid adaptation of first contact physiotherapy services for musculoskeletal patients in the UK and Australia during the COVID-19 pandemic: A multiple case study.Journal of health services research & policy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Limited evidence exists on early COVID-19 related changes in First Contact Physiotherapy Services (FCPS) for musculoskeletal (MSK) patients within the UK primary care (PC) and Australian emergency departments (ED), knowledge that is crucial for understanding their level of responsiveness and readiness for future crises. This study explores the initial changes in FCPS during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK and Australia. The UK and Australia represent a function of both country and their FCPS context (UK [PC], Australia [ED]). A cross-sectional survey was conducted from January-April 2023. Data were self-reported by physiotherapists in FCPS roles, managing MSK patients in the UK and Australia. Only responses from those who recalled changes in FCPS were included, with 153 participants analysed. Descriptive statistics and two-way ANOVA were used to examine the effects of timing of change, country, and their interaction on readiness and responsiveness to MSK patient needs. Overall, 75.7% of initial changes were perceived to have occurred within three months following the World Health Organisation's declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. Participants from both countries differed significantly in their perceptions of how COVID-19 affected patient access to FCPS (p < 0.001). Changes in MSK patient presentation to FCPS varied significantly by both the timing of the change and the country (p < 0.001). Similarly, changes in the care delivery platform were significantly associated with the timing of change (p = 0.014) and the country (p < 0.001). While participants' responses generally indicated inadequate readiness, the overall perceived responsiveness was higher in the UK (using an arbitrary cut-off of ≥50%) compared to Australia. No significant effects of timing or country were found on either readiness or responsiveness. This highlights the need to strengthen FCPS readiness for more responsive future crises. It also suggests the need for contextual considerations when developing readiness strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.