ArticlePloS one2026
Downscaling local distribution of cattle over Guadeloupe archipelago: An adapted method for disaggregating census data.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mapping heartwater risk in Guadeloupe using a combination of spatial modelling approaches.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gridded livestock distribution datasets have been produced for several years and are used in various fields, including epidemiology, livestock impact assessment, and territory management. Those datasets are based on census conducted at national/sub-national scale which are then downscaled using machine learning algorithm and relevant spatial-explicit environmental predictors. The most known dataset of livestock disaggregated observations is the Gridded Livestock of the World (GLW), which produces global maps of livestock density at 10 km spatial resolution for several livestock species. Though this spatial resolution can be appropriate to describe livestock distribution at the global scale, it inherently leads to a coarse representation of breeding species density for smaller territories such as the Caribbean Islands. In this study, we propose an adaptation of the GLW methodology that accounts for the spatial autocorrelation in observed cattle distribution, thereby better capturing the specific characteristics of geographically limited areas such as the Guadeloupean archipelago. Cattle census data were collected for the 32 municipalities of the archipelago and associated to environmental predictors derived from remote sensing and land cover datasets. Together with the Random Forest (RF) algorithm used in the standard GLW methodology, we tested the performance of a Geographical Random Forest (GRF), a novel methodology allowing for taking into account the spatial autocorrelation of the response variable. The GRF algorithm demonstrated significantly better performance compared to the RF algorithm, albeit with longer processing times, and allowed us producing cattle distribution maps for the entire Guadeloupe archipelago at a spatial resolution of 225 m using both algorithms. The approach developed holds potential for application to other small territories, including other islands in the Caribbean.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.