Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41563973›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Improving the measurement resolution in BOTDR sensor with optimized wavelet denoising strategy.

Mustafa Essa Hamzah, Mohd Saiful Dzulkefly Zan, Abdulwahhab Essa Hamzah, Mohd Faisal Ibrahim, Ahmad Ashrif A Bakar, Hisham Mohamad, Yosuke Tanaka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mustafa Essa HamzahDepartment of Electrical, Electronic and Systems Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia.
Mohd Saiful Dzulkefly ZanDepartment of Electrical, Electronic and Systems Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1440-5434
Abdulwahhab Essa HamzahDepartment of Communications Engineering, Iraq University College, Basrah, Iraq.
Mohd Faisal IbrahimDepartment of Electrical, Electronic and Systems Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia.
Ahmad Ashrif A BakarDepartment of Electrical, Electronic and Systems Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia.
Hisham MohamadCivil & Environmental Engineering Department, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Seri Iskandar, Perak, Malaysia.
Yosuke TanakaDivision of Advanced Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Institute of Engineering, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Naka-cho, Koganei, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Signal averaging imposes a significant trade-off between measurement time and measurand resolution in a sub-meter differential cross-spectrum Brillouin optical time domain reflectometry (DCS-BOTDR). This article introduces an optimized post-processing strategy that integrates wavelet denoising (WD) function with a traditional Lorentzian curve fitting (LCF) under relatively low signal averages to mitigate this problem. Symlet, Daubechies, Coiflet, and Biorthogonal Spline WD functions with a 4-level decomposition were executed on a six-core CPU utilizing a single-program-multiple-data (SPMD) paradigm and compared. Experimental validation was executed over distances of 350 meters and 1.21 kilometers of single-mode fiber. The experimental results demonstrate a 2.7 times reduction in required signal averages, in which the proposed LCF + WD method achieved a 2.7 MHz Brillouin frequency shift (BFS) resolution with only 21000 averages, a performance that required 56000 averages using the LCF method alone. To manage the computational load on the large experimental datasets, the algorithm was implemented on a parallel six-core architecture, accelerating the data processing speed by up to 4.8 times compared to serial computation. The method also successfully preserved a 0.4 m spatial resolution and improved temperature resolution to 3°C across a 1.21 km fiber at just 14000 signal averages. In comparison to other methods such as machine learning-based enhancements, the proposed strategy presents a more straightforward, training-free execution that attains comparable BFS and temperature resolutions without the necessity of extensive datasets or rigorous model training. Together with the multicore architecture, the proposed strategy is particularly beneficial for real-time distributed sensing applications where computational resources may be constrained.

Indexed as

Wavelet AnalysisAlgorithmsSignal Processing, Computer-Assisted

Identifiers

PMID41563973
PMCPMC12822973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.