ArticlePloS one2026
Intelligent diagnosis method for river and lake ecosystem health based on improved slime mold algorithm-optimized SVR.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the diagnosis of river and lake ecosystems, there are complex nonlinear relationships among water quality parameters, and their dynamic change mechanisms are rather complicated. Traditional statistical analysis methods have limitations in providing precise assessment and timely early warning. To address the bottlenecks of traditional methods in accuracy, timeliness, and applicability, an intelligent diagnostic model based on improved slime mold algorithm-optimized support vector regression is proposed. This model improves its parameter optimization ability through dynamic weight strategy and adaptive search mechanism, and combines LightGBM feature selection to construct a combined model, effectively solving the problems of high-dimensional data modeling and dynamic adaptability. The experimental findings reveal that the optimized model improves indicators such as RMSE, MAE, and R2 compared to the comparative model. The RMSE is 0.031, the MAE is 0.021, and the R2 is 0.942. The prediction accuracy of the final proposed combination model is further optimized, with an RMSE of 0.022, an MAE of 0.016, and an R2 of 0.976. In addition, the average memory usage of the combined model is 120.5MB. The average sensitivity to outliers was 0.2, and the values were all better than those of the comparison models. At the same time, the prediction effects on pH value, dissolved oxygen, permanganate index, total phosphorus index, ammonia nitrogen index and chemical oxygen demand are relatively good. The research provides efficient and accurate methods for water quality prediction and ecosystem health diagnosis. The results show that the model proposed in the study has superior performance in the diagnosis of river and lake ecosystems and a good actual prediction effect. The intelligent diagnostic method proposed in the study enhances the ecological risk prevention and control capabilities of rivers and lakes, and promotes the digital transformation of water environment management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.