Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41563948›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Assessing sexual dimorphism in the common vampire bat, Desmodus rotundus.

Analorena Cifuentes-Rincon, Karen D Sarmiento-Arias, Diego Soler-Tovar, Abelardo Rodríguez-Bolaños, Carlos Bravo-Garcia, Nicolas Reyes-Amaya, Laura Ávila-Vargas, Luis E Escobar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Analorena Cifuentes-RinconDepartment of Fish and Wildlife Conservation, College of Natural Resources and Environment, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2180-6762
Karen D Sarmiento-AriasLaboratorio de Biodiversidad, Instituto de Ciencias, Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Puebla, México.
Diego Soler-TovarEpidemiology and Public Health Research Group, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Universidad de La Salle, Bogotá, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-0451-6368
Abelardo Rodríguez-BolañosPrograma de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias Matemáticas y Naturales, Grupo de Investigación Biodiversidad de Alta Montana, Museo de Historia Natural, Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas, Bogotá, Colombia.
Carlos Bravo-GarciaPrograma de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias Matemáticas y Naturales, Grupo de Investigación Biodiversidad de Alta Montana, Museo de Historia Natural, Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas, Bogotá, Colombia.ORCID 0009-0001-9599-9544
Nicolas Reyes-AmayaColección de mamíferos, Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt, Villa de Leyva, Boyacá, Colombia.
Laura Ávila-VargasEpidemiology and Public Health Research Group, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Universidad de La Salle, Bogotá, Colombia.
Luis E EscobarDepartment of Fish and Wildlife Conservation, College of Natural Resources and Environment, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, United States of America.

Funding

Mentored Research (K01) Integrative Spatial Epidemiology Study of Wildlife Rabies SpilloverK01AI168452 · NIAID · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI Luis E Escobar · 2023 to 2026
$502k
NIAID NIH HHS K01 AI168452
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sexual dimorphism in bats is understudied, with conflicting evidence across species and geographic regions. For Desmodus rotundus, the common vampire bat, previous reports on morphological sex differences have been inconsistent. This study aimed to assess sexual dimorphism in D. rotundus using a combination of contemporary field measurements and historical museum specimens. We analyzed six morphometric traits, including body mass, head length, body length, tibia length, ear length, and forearm length. Data were collected from 46 wild-captured individuals from five locations across Colombia in South America. Additionally, forearm length was examined in an expanded dataset of 490 specimens, including additional 444 individuals from museum vouchers collected over the past century. Principal components analysis and hierarchical clustering of the six-trait dataset showed patterns of differentiation between sexes, with partial overlap. Forearm length, analyzed independently in the full 490-specimen dataset, showed strong evidence of sexual dimorphism. Females had significantly longer forearms (mean = 61.8 mm) than males (mean = 58.5 mm), with non-overlapping 95% confidence intervals and a highly significant t-test result (t = -12.68, p < 2 × 10 ⁻ ¹⁶). Sex explained 25.7% of the variation in forearm length (R² = 0.26). Tibia length also differed significantly between sexes of the wild-catch individuals (p = 0.004), with females exhibiting greater values. Comparisons between museum specimens (historical) and wild-caught specimens (contemporary) showed no significant differences across time in either sex. Among females, the difference was not significant (t = -0.93, df = 208, p = 0.355), and the same was true for males (t = -0.01, df = 278, p = 0.992). A follow-up MANOVA on the six morphometric traits indicated a significant effect of sex (Pillai's trace = 0.389, approx. F(6,39)=4.14, p < 2.2 × 10 ⁻ ¹⁶). After correcting for multiple comparisons, significant sexual dimorphism remained for forearm and tibia lengths, with forearm showing the strongest signal. These findings provide robust support for modest but consistent female-biased dimorphism in D. rotundus. The use of both multivariate and univariate analysis, combined with long-term historical data, enhanced the reliability of signals detected regarding morphological differences. Desmodus rotundus play a role as a primary reservoir for zoonotic viruses, has potential relevance in biomedical research, and provides ecosystem services. Understanding sex-based morphological variation is critical to inform public health, ecology, and biological conservation strategies. Females were consistently larger than males, but segregation was not absolute, with some individuals falling outside the expected data range for their sex. This study contributes to a clearer understanding of morphological variation and lays the groundwork for future research into the ecological and evolutionary drivers of dimorphism in bats.

Indexed as

ChiropteraSex CharacteristicsAnimalsFemaleMalePrincipal Component Analysis

Identifiers

PMID41563948
PMCPMC12822921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.