ArticleInternational journal of surgery (London, England)2026
Evaluation of lymph nodes in various surgical approaches for clinical N0 lung cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Article in International journal of surgery (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundClinical N0 lung cancer is surgically treated using a variety of approaches. Nevertheless, a comparison of the effectiveness of these approaches in evaluating lymph node (LN) remains to be conducted.
objectiveTo evaluate the upgrading rate of LN staging, the total number of resected LNs, and the number of resected LN stations in clinical N0 lung cancer among four surgical approaches.
methodsA comprehensive search was conducted across the PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and CENTRAL databases, encompassing papers published between 1 January 2005, and 31 March 2025. The pooled effect size was measured using odds ratios (ORs) or standardized mean differences (SMDs), as well as 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was utilized to calculate the cumulative probability for each approach. In order to investigate the origins of heterogeneity, meta-regression and subgroup analyses were employed.
resultsA total of 71 070 participants from 30 studies were included in the analysis. The incidence of cN0-pN1 was higher in the open thoracotomy (OPEN) group than in the robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) groups [OR = 0.53 (0.32, 0.89), OR = 0.36 (0.26, 0.51), respectively]. OPEN had the highest SUCRA (97.7%), followed by RATS (59.5%) and VATS (27.3%). Regarding cN0-pN2, both the OPEN and RATS groups exhibited a higher incidence than the VATS group [OR = 0.39 (0.16, 0.91), OR = 0.20 (0.06, 0.64), respectively] with RATS demonstrating the greatest SUCRA (92.3%), followed by OPEN (56.8%) and VATS (0.9%). The video-assisted mediastinoscopic lymphadenectomy plus video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VM + VATS) group removed more total LNs than the VATS group [SMD = 6.66 (1.54, 11.77)], with VM + VATS having the highest SUCRA (97.7%), followed by RATS (57.8%), OPEN (44.1%), and VATS (0.4%). Heterogeneity was evident in cN0-pN2 and total LNs. Regression analysis revealed that sample size could explain some of the heterogeneity observed in cN0-pN2 [coef = 0.62 (0.04-1.26)], whereas sample size, publication year, and surgical area could explain some of the heterogeneity observed in total LNs [coef = - 21.3 (-42.03-4.23), coef = - 21.02 (-42.26-3.25), coef = - 12.54 (-31.59-3.70), respectively]. Subgroup analysis supported the previous findings.
conclusionsIn terms of nodal upstaging incidence for cN0-pN1 and cN0-pN2, both OPEN and RATS performed well. For N1 lymph node (LN) resection, the OPEN approach is superior to the RATS and VATS approaches, whereas for N2, the RATS approach is superior to the OPEN and VATS approaches. Regarding the total number of LNs removed, the video-assisted mediastinoscopic lymphadenectomy (VM) + VATS and OPEN have obvious advantages. The publication year, sample size, and surgical area affected the incidence of cN0-pN2 and the total number of LNs removed. These findings may help thoracic surgeons to select different surgical approaches for patients with clinical N0 lung cancer and different tendencies for LN metastasis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.