Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41563872›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine2026

CBCT assessment of maxillary sinus dimensions in a Saudi subpopulation: a retrospective study.

Abdullah F Alshammari, Ahmed A Madfa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Abdullah F AlshammariDepartment of Basic Dental and Medical Science, College of Dentistry, University of Ha'il, Ha'il, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-5200-6362
Ahmed A MadfaMedical and Diagnostic Research Center, University of Ha'il, Ha'il, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-6124-0129

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe maxillary sinus (MS) exhibits interindividual anatomical variation influenced by sex, age, and craniofacial morphology. Understanding these variations is essential for surgical, endodontic, and implant planning. However, morphometric data for Saudi subpopulations, particularly from northern regions such as Ha'il, remain limited.

objectiveTo assess MS morphometric dimensions using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in a Saudi subpopulation from the Ha'il region and to evaluate variations according to sex, age, and laterality.

methodsA retrospective CBCT-based cross-sectional study analysed 1,018 scans of Saudi adults aged 18-70 years. Sinus width, length, area, and perimeter were measured bilaterally on standardised coronal sections. Statistical analyses included Mann-Whitney U, Wilcoxon signed-rank, Kruskal-Wallis, and repeated-measures ANCOVA tests, with significance set at

resultsMales demonstrated significantly larger MS dimensions than females, particularly for area (

conclusionCBCT-based morphometric assessment of the MS in a Saudi subpopulation from the Ha'il region revealed significant sex-related differences, minimal laterality-related asymmetry, and stable dimensions across adult age groups. These region-specific normative data enhance anatomical understanding and support improved diagnostic accuracy and procedural safety in implantology, oral surgery, maxillofacial practice, and forensic applications.

Indexed as

Cone-Beam Computed TomographyMaxillary SinusAdolescentAdultAgedAge FactorsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSaudi ArabiaSex FactorsYoung AdultAsymmetrycone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)Ha’il regionmaxillary sinusmorphometrySaudi populationsexual dimorphism

Identifiers

PMID41563872
PMCPMC12825576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.