Observational studyKidney3602026
Kidney Function Decline in Sickle Cell Disease: Associations with Renin-Angiotensin System Inhibitors.
Observational study in Kidney360, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
key pointsRenin-angiotensin system inhibitor use was not associated with slowed GFR decline in sickle cell disease. This null association did not change after excluding low-dose renin-angiotensin system inhibitors or including an interaction term with sickle cell disease therapies. Our findings highlight the limitations of real-world data and underscore the urgent need for prospective trials and novel therapeutics.
backgroundSickle cell disease (SCD) is associated with accelerated kidney function decline, with no proven effective therapies. We examined the associations between treatment with renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi) and eGFR decline in SCD.
methodsThis two-center observational study used electronic health record data of adult, Black patients with SCD (by hemoglobin electrophoresis), and ≥1-year follow-up between 2010 and 2024. We compared incident RASi users (exposure) to no treatment (reference). We created 1:1 propensity score-matched cohorts, balancing on demographics, vital signs, comorbidities, medications, and laboratory values. The primary end point was the difference in the mean change in eGFR per year, analyzing only chronic slopes (≥90 days postindex date) using linear mixed models on the matched cohorts. Sensitivity analyses were performed excluding patients with missing albuminuria and excluding low-dose RASi. Effect modification by SCD-modifying therapies was also examined.
resultsMatched cohorts identified were primary analysis (358 patients), excluding missing albuminuria data (262 patients), and excluding low-dose RASi (270 patients). All cohorts achieved optimal standardized mean differences <0.2. After multivariable adjustment, there was no significant difference in eGFR decline between RASi and the reference in the primary cohort (-0.15 ml/min per year; 95% confidence interval [CI], -1.67 to +1.36; P = 0.84), the sensitivity analysis cohort excluding missing albuminuria data (+0.89 ml/min per year; 95% CI, -0.86 to +2.63; P = 0.32), and the sensitivity analysis cohort excluding low-dose RASi (+0.78 ml/min per year; 95% CI, -1.12 to +2.67; P = 0.42). All P values for interaction terms between RASi and SCD-modifying therapies in all models were >0.05.
conclusionsIn this large, real-world cohort of patients with SCD, RASi use was not associated with slowed eGFR decline. These findings underscore the limitations of observational data and highlight the urgent need for prospective trials to identify effective GFR-preserving therapies for this high-risk population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.