ReviewAnnual review of biomedical engineering2026
Federated Learning in Healthcare: From Research to Real-World Deployment.
Review in Annual review of biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Digital Transformation of Rehabilitation Medicine: A Narrative Review of Artificial Intelligence Innovations, Clinical Integration, and Future Paradigms.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2026Review
- Recent advances in artificial intelligence across interventional pulmonology: a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- Towards federated learning for face recognition: a comprehensive review of secure and privacy-preserving techniques and prospective research.Pattern analysis and applications : PAA · 2026Article
- Current and Future Applications of AI-Driven Predictive Modeling and a Proposed Framework for AI-Bioprognostics in Kidney Care.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI), including deep and traditional machine learning, holds great promise for advancing biomedical research and healthcare. However, most AI studies remain academic in nature and rarely transition into clinical practice, largely due to limited access to diverse real-world datasets. Centralized learning, the traditional approach to multi-institutional collaboration, is hindered by privacy, legal, and logistical barriers. Federated learning (FL) offers a decentralized alternative, enabling institutions to collaboratively train models without sharing sensitive patient data. This article reviews key algorithmic, privacy, and practical developments in FL for biomedical engineering, including strategies to handle non-identical data distributions and safeguard privacy through differential privacy, secure aggregation, and confidential computing. We also discuss current limitations and considerations for the need of scalable, interoperable infrastructures. FL represents a paradigm shift toward building generalizable, equitable, and clinically impactful AI models. Realizing this vision requires continued advances, such as FL-as-a-service platforms and regulatory-aligned workflows that support persistent and trustworthy model deployment to truly realize AI's promise in patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.