Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41563839›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of biomedical engineering2026

Federated Learning in Healthcare: From Research to Real-World Deployment.

Spyridon Bakas, Xiaoxiao Li, Prashant Shah, Holger R Roth

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Spyridon BakasCenter for Federated Learning in Medicine, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA; email: spbakas@iu.edu.
Xiaoxiao LiDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Prashant ShahMedical Research Group, MLCommons, San Francisco, California, USA.
Holger R RothNVIDIA, Santa Clara, California, USA.

Funding

Privacy-Aware Federated Learning for Breast Cancer Risk AssessmentU24CA279629 · NCI · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI Spyridon Bakas · 2023 to 2026
$2.9M
The Federated Tumor Segmentation (FeTS) platform: An intuitive tool facilitating secure multi-institutional collaborationU01CA242871 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BAKAS, SPYRIDON · 2019 to 2021
$1.1M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA242871NCI NIH HHS U24 CA279629
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI), including deep and traditional machine learning, holds great promise for advancing biomedical research and healthcare. However, most AI studies remain academic in nature and rarely transition into clinical practice, largely due to limited access to diverse real-world datasets. Centralized learning, the traditional approach to multi-institutional collaboration, is hindered by privacy, legal, and logistical barriers. Federated learning (FL) offers a decentralized alternative, enabling institutions to collaboratively train models without sharing sensitive patient data. This article reviews key algorithmic, privacy, and practical developments in FL for biomedical engineering, including strategies to handle non-identical data distributions and safeguard privacy through differential privacy, secure aggregation, and confidential computing. We also discuss current limitations and considerations for the need of scalable, interoperable infrastructures. FL represents a paradigm shift toward building generalizable, equitable, and clinically impactful AI models. Realizing this vision requires continued advances, such as FL-as-a-service platforms and regulatory-aligned workflows that support persistent and trustworthy model deployment to truly realize AI's promise in patient care.

Indexed as

Biomedical EngineeringDelivery of Health CareFederated LearningAlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceBiomedical ResearchComputer SecurityConfidentialityHumansMachine LearningPrivacybig datafairnessfederated learninghealthcareprivacysecurity

Identifiers

PMID41563839
PMCPMC13526429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.