SynthesisNeurosurgical review2026
Comparative outcomes of surpass streamline and evolve flow diverters in intracranial aneurysms: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of location, size, and morphology.
Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy and safety of flow diverters for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Postoperative acute ultra-early fish mouthing of a Surpass Evolve flow diverter leading to ischemic complication.Radiology case reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Surpass flow diverter, including Streamline and Evolve, features a unique design optimized for improved conformability, opening, and wall apposition. Its unique pore structure allows for deployment across a wide range of arterial diameters, contributing to its high occlusion rates. The current study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of the Surpass Streamline and Evolve in treating intracranial aneurysms, with a focus on location, size, and morphology. A systematic review and meta-analysis was carried out according to the PRISMA guidelines, utilizing PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase, from inception to August 1st, 2024. Relevant data were extracted, and data synthesis was performed using STATA v.17. The analysis included 27 studies with 1,826 patients (76.7% female; ages 28-84 years) and 2,006 intracranial aneurysms (1,743 anterior, 222 posterior; 28 blister, 20 dissecting, 116 fusiform, and 1,597 saccular). The pooled complete occlusion rate at the final follow-up was 77%, with no significant differences between anterior (80%) and posterior (64%) circulation aneurysms (P = 0.15) or small (70%) and large/giant (79%) aneurysms (P = 0.36). Morphological analysis revealed that blister, dissecting, saccular, and fusiform aneurysms had 100%, 65%, 55%, and 79% complete occlusion rates, respectively (P < 0.001). Surpass Streamline had 81% complete occlusion success versus 69% for Evolve (P = 0.04). The overall adequate occlusion rate was 90%, with Streamline at 92% and Evolve at 88% (P = 0.35). Higher occlusion rates were observed in posterior aneurysms (100% vs. 92%; P < 0.001). Large/giant aneurysms had a higher rate of adequate occlusion (100% vs. 88%; P = 0.12). Morphological analysis showed that blister and dissecting aneurysms had 100% adequate occlusion, fusiform aneurysms had 75% adequate occlusion, and saccular aneurysms had 96% adequate occlusion (P = 0.04). Mortality, complications and in-stent thrombosis were significantly reduced with Evolve (P = 0.03, 0.001 and 0.000, respectively). Our study indicates the efficacy and safety of the Surpass flow diverter for treating intracranial aneurysms, offering a satisfactory occlusion rate. The surpass Evolve was associated with a lower incidence of major complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.