ReviewJournal of robotic surgery2026
A decade of progress in orthopaedic telesurgery from concept to clinical feasibility: an evidence based review of robotics, latency science, digital ecosystems, and future remote surgical practice.
Review in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence and machine learning in robotic, teleoperated, and remote surgery: a bibliometric and knowledge mapping analysis (2015-2025).Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Telesurgery has transitioned from theoretical exploration to clinical demonstration over the past decade, driven by advances in robotic precision, real-time imaging, and next-generation communication networks. Orthopaedic surgery, traditionally challenging for remote intervention due to reliance on tactile feedback and millimetre-level accuracy, has increasingly adopted enabling technologies including 5G networks, navigation-guided robotics, extended reality, and artificial intelligence. This review synthesises evidence from twenty three key studies published between 2015 and 2025, comprising systematic reviews, engineering latency experiments, bibliometric analyses, telemedicine evaluations, and early telesurgical demonstrations. Spine surgery emerges as the most mature subspecialty for remote robotic operation, with clinical reports demonstrating 5G-enabled remote pedicle screw placement. Trauma surgery appears to be in a transitional phase, supported by remote pelvic screw navigation and experimental fracture-reduction robotics. Arthroplasty robotics, while not yet applied remotely, provide a critical technological foundation. Despite encouraging trends, substantial limitations remain, including latency sensitivity, limited haptic fidelity, regulatory barriers, and lack of large-scale clinical telesurgery trials. These challenges point toward future priorities involving hybrid autonomy, network redundancy, advanced haptics, and AI-driven predictive control. The convergence of robotics, digital ecosystems, and high-speed communication networks suggests that orthopaedic telesurgery may become a viable and transformative clinical reality in the coming decade.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41563593What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.