Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41563588›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2026

Use of supportive care services and advance care planning among early phase oncology clinical trial participants.

Leah L Thompson, Megan Healy, Virginia Capasso, Jaewon Yoon, Andrew Johnson, Viola Bame, Caterina Florissi, Priya Amin, Sarah Lipson, Hope Heldreth and 8 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Interpreting the association between supportive care use and advance care planning in early-phase trial participants.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Leah L ThompsonDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology & Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital & Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
Megan HealyCancer Center Protocol Office, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.
Virginia CapassoDepartment of Nursing & Patient Care Services, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St., Yawkey 7A, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Jaewon YoonDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology & Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital & Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
Andrew JohnsonCancer Center Protocol Office, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.
Viola BameCancer Center Protocol Office, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.
Caterina FlorissiDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology & Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital & Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
Priya AminDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology & Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital & Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
Sarah LipsonDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology & Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital & Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
Hope HeldrethDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology & Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital & Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
Cynthia MooreDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.
Mary BoulangerDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology & Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital & Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
Anh LamUniversity of Oklahoma Stephenson Cancer Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Casandra McIntyreDepartment of Nursing & Patient Care Services, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St., Yawkey 7A, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Dejan JuricDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology & Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital & Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
Ryan D NippUniversity of Oklahoma Stephenson Cancer Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Debra M Lundquist *Cancer Center Protocol Office, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA. debra.lundquist@mgh.harvard.edu.
Rachel B Jimenez *Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly phase clinical trials (EP-CTs) investigate novel therapeutic approaches for patients with cancer, but little is known about patterns of supportive care service utilization and advance care planning (ACP) in this population. We sought to characterize these features in an EP-CT population and evaluate associations among receipt of supportive care services and ACP documentation.

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed the electronic health record (EHR) of consecutive patients enrolled in EP-CTs at Massachusetts General Hospital from 01/01/17-12/30/19. We abstracted sociodemographics, performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [ECOG] score), oncology history, trial details, as well as receipt and timing of six supportive care services (palliative care [PC], social work [SW], spiritual services [SS], parental support [PS], physical therapy [PT], and nutrition). We additionally abstracted receipt and timing of ACP documentation (defined as any EHR-documented conversation addressing illness understanding or values, preferences, or goals for future medical care, as identified using a structured keyword search). We then separately examined associations between receipt of any supportive care service and ACP documentation, number of supportive care services received and ACP documentation, and subtype of supportive care received and ACP documentation. These analyses used logistic regression models adjusted for age, sex, cancer type, and performance status.

resultsDuring our study period, 376 patients participated in EP-CTs (median age 63.0 years, 55.9% female, 97.3% stage 4, median ECOG 1, median follow-up: 223 days, median time from diagnosis to EP-CT: 844 days). Nearly all received at least one type of supportive care across their illness trajectory (88.0%), with varied rates by service type (PC: 54.8%, SW: 64.1%, SS: 39.1%, PS: 8.0%, PT: 54.0%, nutrition: 61.2%). Most also had some form of ACP (73.9%) documented between diagnosis and death. Multivariable regression models demonstrated that receipt of any of the six forms of supportive care was associated with higher likelihood of ACP documentation (odds ratio [OR]: 9.18, 95% confidence interval (CI): 4.49-18.78, p < 0.001). Similarly, we observed associations between number of supportive care services received when considered as a continuous covariate and ACP documentation (OR

conclusionsIn this large cohort of EP-CT participants, most patients received supportive care services and had documented ACP, suggesting trial-related engagement does not impede care delivery. Notably, receipt of supportive care services correlated with ACP documentation. These findings underscore the importance of addressing individual supportive care needs among EP-CT participants.

Indexed as

Advance Care PlanningNeoplasmsPalliative CareAdultAgedAged, 80 and overClinical Trials as TopicElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansMaleMassachusettsMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesAdvance care planningEarly phase clinical trialsGoals of careNutritionPalliative careParental supportPhysical therapySocial workSpiritual careSupportive care

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.