ArticleCancer causes & control : CCC2026
Dietary patterns linked to gut microbiota and their association with gynecologic cancers: NHANES 2011-2018.
Article in Cancer causes & control : CCC, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe diet-induced gut microbiota (DI-GM) score captures diet quality relevant to microbial health. However, its association with gynecological cancer (GC) remains unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between DI-GM scores and gynecological cancer risk in U.S. women.
methodsWe analyzed data from 8,512 adult women aged ≥ 20 years from The U.S. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2011-2018. DI-GM scores reflected intake of 14 food groups classified as beneficial or harmful to gut microbial health. Multivariable survey-weighted logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), adjusting for covariates.
resultsWomen with GC had significantly lower DI-GM scores than those without (mean 4.7 vs. 5.0; p = 0.031). Higher DI-GM scores were associated with reduced GC risk (adjusted OR per unit increase: 0.92; 95% CI 0.87-0.98; p = 0.011). Participants with DI-GM ≥ 6 had 27% lower odds of GC compared to those with scores 0-3 (p = 0.037). The beneficial component of DI-GM was independently associated with lower GC risk. No significant effect modification was observed in stratified analyses.
conclusionGreater adherence to a microbiota-friendly diet may lower gynecological cancer risk in women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.