ArticleClinical and experimental medicine2026
A multimarker panel for diagnosis and prognosis prediction of fungal infections.
Article in Clinical and experimental medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Admission D-Dimer for Early Risk Stratification of in-Hospital Mortality in Adults with Non-HIV Cryptococcal Meningitis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Infection and drug resistance · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To develop and validate a routine indicator-based multimarker panel for fungal infection (FI) diagnosis and prognosis prediction. A retrospective cohort of 134 patients (63 FI, 71 non-FI) was stratified randomly into a training set (n = 75) and validation set (n = 59). Differential indicators were screened via non-parametric tests and univariate logistic regression, with LASSO regression verifying core variables. Four machine learning algorithms (logistic regression, SVM, GNB, LightGBM) were compared via 5-fold cross-validation. The model with the best performance was validated in the validation set. Six core indicators (hsCRP, BNP, PT%, D-Dimer, IL-17, PCT) were selected. The logistic regression algorithm was finally selected for modeling because of its optimal efficacy in the training set. The logistic-based model in validation set showed better performance than others. The diagnostic AUC was 0.845, sensitivity was 80.00%, specificity was 72.41%. The prognostic AUC was 0.767, sensitivity was 72.41% and specificity was 90.00%, outperforming single indicators. The logistic regression-derived multimarker panel integrates inflammatory, coagulation, and cardiac biomarkers, offering a reliable, accessible tool for FI diagnosis and prognostic stratification, especially in resource-limited settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.