Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41563559›Full record

ArticleClinical and experimental medicine2026

A multimarker panel for diagnosis and prognosis prediction of fungal infections.

Yunyan Lou, Fanghao Yu, Yanting Zhao, Jianxin He

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and experimental medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yunyan LouDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Yiwu Central Hospital, Yiwu, 322000, China.
Fanghao YuDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Yiwu Central Hospital, Yiwu, 322000, China.
Yanting ZhaoDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Yiwu Central Hospital, Yiwu, 322000, China.
Jianxin HeDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Yiwu Central Hospital, Yiwu, 322000, China. 18357961263@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To develop and validate a routine indicator-based multimarker panel for fungal infection (FI) diagnosis and prognosis prediction. A retrospective cohort of 134 patients (63 FI, 71 non-FI) was stratified randomly into a training set (n = 75) and validation set (n = 59). Differential indicators were screened via non-parametric tests and univariate logistic regression, with LASSO regression verifying core variables. Four machine learning algorithms (logistic regression, SVM, GNB, LightGBM) were compared via 5-fold cross-validation. The model with the best performance was validated in the validation set. Six core indicators (hsCRP, BNP, PT%, D-Dimer, IL-17, PCT) were selected. The logistic regression algorithm was finally selected for modeling because of its optimal efficacy in the training set. The logistic-based model in validation set showed better performance than others. The diagnostic AUC was 0.845, sensitivity was 80.00%, specificity was 72.41%. The prognostic AUC was 0.767, sensitivity was 72.41% and specificity was 90.00%, outperforming single indicators. The logistic regression-derived multimarker panel integrates inflammatory, coagulation, and cardiac biomarkers, offering a reliable, accessible tool for FI diagnosis and prognostic stratification, especially in resource-limited settings.

Indexed as

BiomarkersMycosesFemaleFibrin Fibrinogen Degradation ProductsHumansLogistic ModelsMachine LearningPrognosisRetrospective StudiesROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificityBiomarkersFibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Productsfibrin fragment DCombined detectionDiagnosisFungal infectionPrognosisROC curve

Identifiers

PMID41563559
PMCPMC12847204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.