ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2026
Contemporary Assessment and Management of Effusive-Constrictive Pericarditis.
Review in Current cardiology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cardiac tamponade caused by effusive-constrictive pericarditis in a patient with common variable immunodeficiency: a case report.International journal of emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Lyme Myopericarditis With Effusive-Constrictive Physiology: Serial CMR Identifies a Reversible Inflammatory Phenotype.JACC. Case reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewEffusive-constrictive pericarditis (ECP) is a complex clinical condition that combines features of pericardial effusion/tamponade and constrictive pericarditis. The classic hemodynamic definition is persistent elevation of right atrial pressure despite drainage of a pericardial effusion. This review summarizes recent data on its epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management. RECENT
findingsPrevalence varies from 2.4% to 14.8% depending on diagnostic criteria and etiology, reaching up to 50% in tuberculous pericarditis in endemic regions. Common causes include idiopathic, infectious (particularly tuberculous and bacterial), malignant, and post-surgical etiologies. While invasive hemodynamic assessment remains the reference standard, echocardiography is now the primary diagnostic tool, enabling recognition of constrictive physiology before and after pericardiocentesis. Cardiac magnetic resonance adds complementary information on pericardial thickness, inflammation, and potential for reversibility, aiding therapeutic decisions. Inflammatory ECP frequently resolves with medical therapy (NSAIDs, colchicine, corticosteroids, or IL-1 inhibitors) while tuberculous cases require antimicrobial therapy with corticosteroids in selected patients. ECP is a heterogeneous condition with variable clinical trajectories. Early identification through multimodality imaging is essential to guide therapy, target reversible inflammation, and prevent chronic constriction. Most inflammatory cases respond to anti-inflammatory treatment, whereas pericardiectomy is reserved for persistent, irreversible constrictive physiology despite optimal medical therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.