ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2026
Clinical outcomes of three-fraction versus five-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery for resected brain metastases.
Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Advances in the prevention and treatment of radiation-induced brain necrosis: a narrative review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo investigate the clinical outcomes of patients with brain metastases undergoing surgery followed by postoperative three-fraction or five-fraction radiosurgery (SRS) to the resection cavity. Factors associated with local failure and symptomatic radionecrosis were evaluated. PATIENTS AND
methodsOne hundred and ninety consecutive patients with 202 brain metastases who received surgery followed by three- or five-fraction SRS to the surgical bed were analyzed. All cavities included in the study received either 27 Gy in 3 fractions or 30 Gy in 5 fractions given daily on consecutive days. Cumulative incidence analysis was used to compare local control and symptomatic radionecrosis between groups from the time of SRS.
resultsTen cavities after 3-fraction and 14 lesions after 5-fraction SRS group recurred (p = 0.38) with a median time to progression of 12 months. Cumulative LC rates were 93% (87–97) and 90.2% (87.5–94.5) at 1 year, and 90% (84–96) and 85.5% (76.2–91.3) at 2 years (p = 0.4) for 3-fraction and 5-fraction SRS groups, respectively. Symptomatic radionecrosis developed in 28 patients (3-fraction SRS,16; 5-fraction SRS,12), requiring surgery or medical treatment; the 1-year and 2-year cumulative rates were 12.8% (8.3–22.4%) and 17.9% (12.3–28.9%), respectively, after 3-fraction SRS, and 9.8% (6.5–19.1%) and 13.0% (7.3–22.2%), respectively, after 5-fraction SRS (p = 0.3). Sixteen patients after 3-fraction and fourteen patients after 5-fraction SRS developed leptomeningeal disease (LMD); 1-year LMD cumulative rates were 13.5% and 13.8%.
conclusionsBoth 3 × 9 Gy and 5 × 6 Gy are effective SRS treatment modalities for resected brain metastases associated with high local control and low risk of symptomatic radionecrosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.