ArticleInternational journal of health economics and management2026
The impact of performance-based capitation on diabetes care: Evidence from Indonesia's national health insurance program.
Article in International journal of health economics and management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Indonesia’s National Health Insurance (JKN) introduced the Performance-Based Capitation scheme (Kapitasi Berbasis Komitmen, KBK) in 2015–2016 as a supplement to the existing capitation system and scaled it nationally in 2019. This study evaluates the impact of KBK on Diabetes Mellitus (DM)-related primary care utilization using 2015–2020 BPJS Kesehatan sample data, as DM alone accounted for IDR 8.23 trillion (USD 499 million) in JKN claims in 2022, raising concerns about the JKN financial sustainability. We employ a Regression Discontinuity in Time (RDiT) design to estimate causal effects, using a donut hole specification to address anticipation bias, applying alternative bandwidths for sensitivity analysis, and conducting placebo tests to assess robustness. Our findings indicate modest but significant improvements in primary care utilization at Puskesmas, particularly in contact rates (3.3% points), visit rates (6.9% points) and visit frequency (3.1% points). However, KBK had minimal impact on private clinic (klinik pratama), with most utilization metrics remaining insignificant, except for a 6.3% point increase in visit frequency. Additionally, despite increased service utilization at primary health care (FKTPs), referral rates to Advanced Referral Healthcare Facilities (FKRTLs) did not significantly decline. The study concludes that while KBK has led to some improvements, it has not fully met its objectives. Accordingly we recommend strengthening outcome-based performance indicators, mandating Prolanis enrollment for DM patients, and reformulating capitation incentives to better align with provider behavior and capacity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41563510What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.