ReviewOrthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026
[Artificial intelligence in spinal surgery: current applications and future perspectives].
Review in Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSpinal surgery is a highly complex field increasingly shaped by digital innovation. Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) offer new opportunities to enhance diagnostics, surgical planning, intraoperative precision, and postoperative care.
methodsA narrative review was conducted based on a selective literature search in PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Included were peer-reviewed studies from the past 15 years focusing on clinically relevant AI applications across pre-, intra-, and postoperative phases of spinal surgery.
resultsIn the preoperative setting, AI supports history taking, imaging analysis (e.g., automated segmentation, fracture detection, scoliosis measurement), and personalized risk stratification. Intraoperatively, AI facilitates navigation, 3D reconstruction, augmented reality (AR) integration, and robotic assistance. Postoperatively, ML models predict complications, readmissions, and reherniations and assist with telemonitoring. Many systems are still in validation stages.
conclusionArtificial intelligence has the potential to fundamentally transform spinal surgery through increased precision, efficiency, and individualized decision support. Successful clinical integration requires validated algorithms, interdisciplinary collaboration, and ethical frameworks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41563474What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.