SynthesisJournal of neurology2026
Prevalence of vestibulo-ocular reflex dysfunction in people with neurological disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNeurological disorders, a leading cause of global disability, often cause debilitating dizziness and imbalance. While subjective symptoms are well-documented, the actual prevalence of vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) dysfunction in patients with central nervous system (CNS) damage remains unclear due to inconsistent primary studies. This research aims to determine the prevalence of VOR gain dysfunction, as measured by the video Head Impulse Test (vHIT), across neurological disorders.
methodsOur systematic review searched MEDLINE, CENTRAL, CINAHL, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the WHO ICTRP for original articles from 2009 to September 2025. The JBI Checklist for prevalence studies was used to assess the methodological quality, and descriptive analyses were performed, followed by a meta-analysis of proportions using a random-intercept logistic regression model.
resultsWe included 48 studies, of which three reported on the same or overlapping samples. Thus, 45 unique studies (1604 participants, 792 females, mean age 56) were described. A meta-analysis of 33 studies (1129 participants) found an overall prevalence of vestibular dysfunction of 48% (95% CI 31-67%). Given the high heterogeneity, we performed subgroup analyses by condition. We found a pooled prevalence of 98% for CANVAS, 73% for ataxia, 44% for Parkinson's disease, 59% for multiple sclerosis, 15% for traumatic brain injury, 5% for multiple system atrophy, and 77% for superficial siderosis.
conclusionIsolated semicircular canal dysfunctions, as documented using vHIT, are prevalent in neurological disorders. Future research must elucidate their etiology and diagnostic potential, utilizing comprehensive vestibular assessments. Eventually, these findings should be translated into improved, evidence-based rehabilitation strategies. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: CRD42024575542.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.