ArticleEuropean archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience2026
Episodic memory deficits and processes in post-COVID condition.
Article in European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cognitive dysfunction is one of the most prevalent symptoms in patients with post-COVID condition (PCC) and episodic memory has been highlighted as one of the most impaired cognitive domains in these patients. However, few studies have specifically assessed episodic memory processes in these patients. This study aims to comprehensively investigate the memory function in patients with PCC. We conducted a cross-sectional study involving 157 patients with PCC and 74 healthy controls. Participants underwent a comprehensive neuropsychological assessment and memory assessment, including the Loewenstein-Acevedo Scale for Semantic Interference and Learning (LASSI-L), the Free and Cued Selective Reminding test (FCSRT), the Open-Trial Selective Reminding Test (OT-SRT), and a Mental Ability Questionnaire (FLEI). We compared groups and evaluated the correlation between episodic memory and neuropsychological and clinical assessments. Patients with PCC showed reduced performance on the LASSI-L, the FCSRT and the OT-SRT compared to controls. The memory scores showed positive moderate correlations with attention tests and positive low correlations with language, visuospatial or executive functions. Subjective memory complaints were related to poorer memory performance. LASSI-L was the test most associated with subjective memory complaints, whereas OT-SRT was the test less influenced by attention tests. The study found multiple memory processes impaired in patients with PCC, specifically in initial encoding, learning information acquisition and storage, and in retrieval, with only partial improvement with cues and recognition, and with significant susceptibility to the effects of retroactive semantic interference. These findings are relevant for characterising the cognitive deficits of patients with PCC and for designing interventional strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.