SynthesisScandinavian journal of work, environment & health2026
Work schedule characteristics and sleepiness - a meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesSleepiness is a specific aspect of fatigue and considered a key factor linking working time to health and safety outcomes, such as occupational injuries. Therefore, this meta-analysis synthesizes evidence on how specific work schedule characteristics relate to sleepiness. Specifically, we examine how sleepiness varies with: (a) shift type (eg, day versus night), (b) shift length, and (c) the number of consecutive shifts.
methodsWe conducted a systematic literature search across multiple platforms and databases. Only studies that measured sleepiness using the Karolinska Sleepiness Scale were included. Mean effect sizes (Hedges` g) were calculated using random-effects models.
resultsThe analysis included 48 studies (28 on shift type, 30 on shift length, and 13 on shift number). Compared to day shifts, sleepiness was significantly higher during night shifts and lower during afternoon shifts. Sleepiness increased with shift length during night shifts but showed no consistent pattern during day shifts. Furthermore, sleepiness was highest on the first night shift and decreased over subsequent nights, whereas it remained relatively stable across consecutive day shifts. Due to the low number of studies, results on shift length and shift number were limited or unavailable for afternoon shifts.
conclusionsOverall, this meta-analysis shows that sleepiness is most pronounced during night shifts, particularly the first in a block. These findings emphasize the importance of circadian and homeostatic factors in shift work. Therefore, shift schedules should be designed to mitigate these heightened risks, for example by allowing sufficient recovery time before and during the first night shift.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.