ReviewBrazilian dental journal2026
Advances in Composite Bioactive Scaffolds for Alveolar Bone Repair: Implications for Oral Surgery.
Review in Brazilian dental journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Scaffold-Based Biomaterials for Periodontal Regeneration in Periodontitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Review
- Cotton-Type Nanofiber Guided Pathway Engineering Enables Rapid Tissue Integration and Accelerated Bone Regeneration in Mineral Powder-Based Bone Grafts.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Craniofacial bone defects present a unique challenge due to the complex anatomical and functional demands of the region. Composite bioactive scaffolds have emerged as promising strategies for bone regeneration, combining the structural support of inorganic materials with the biological responsiveness of natural or synthetic polymers. This review discusses recent advancements in composite scaffolds tailored for alveolar and maxillofacial bone repair, with an emphasis on material selection, scaffold architecture, bioactivity, and therapeutic delivery capabilities. Key features, including porosity, mechanical strength, degradation rate, and anatomical adaptability, are evaluated for their clinical relevance. Furthermore, the roles of ion release, surface topography, and incorporation of growth factors or stem cells in modulating osteogenesis, angiogenesis, and immune responses are highlighted. Recent innovations also include dual-functional scaffolds that can promote bone formation while delivering antimicrobial or anti-inflammatory agents. Although most remain in preclinical stages, some composite scaffolds, particularly those based on hydroxyapatite, β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP), and bioactive glass, have progressed to clinical applications in dental implantology. The integration of biomimetic cues, 3D printing, and controlled drug release marks a significant step forward in personalized bone tissue engineering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.