ArticleRevista latino-americana de enfermagem2026
Ethical climate in the primary health care workplace: a mixed-method study.
Article in Revista latino-americana de enfermagem, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
to analyze the ethical climate in the primary health care workplace in a municipality in the Amazon region, combining quantitative and qualitative data. a convergent, parallel, mixed-method study. Qualitative data from interviews with 46 professionals underwent reflective thematic analysis. Quantitative data were obtained from 170 professionals using the Ethical Climate Inventory. Exploratory factor analysis tested the Ethical Climate Inventory model, proposing a new configuration for the items, with greater explanatory power than that maintained in the confirmatory factor analysis. Data integration was independent and presented in a joint display. items with the highest factor loadings of the four factors of the Ethical Climate Inventory (1. principles and rules, 2. benevolence, 3. independence/individualism, and 4. sense of community/social responsibility) were analyzed in conjunction with the qualitative category, with multiple expressions of subjectivity and ethics in the workplace. No divergences were observed between the data, only convergences and complementarity in analytical syntheses by factor. data integration broadened the understanding of the ethical climate in a little-explored scenario, demonstrating the distinction of this reality in terms of the constructs analyzed and the strength of ethical elements as a conceptual and analytical tool for workplace environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.