ArticleCadernos de saude publica2026
[Classification and characterization of exposure among artisanal fishers to the oil spill in Pernambuco, Brazil].
Article in Cadernos de saude publica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study sought to classify and characterize the exposure of artisanal fishers from Pernambuco, Brazil, to oil during disaster-crime that took place on the Northeast coast of the country in 2019. A cross-sectional epidemiological study was conducted involving interviews with 1,259 artisanal fishers registered with 27 fishing colonies and/or associations along the coast of Pernambuco. Cluster analysis was employed with non-hierarchical k-modes for the classification of the degree of exposure: low (72.3%) - most had no direct contact; medium (12.3%) - 66.4% handled contaminated materials, 60% smelled the odor, and 63% had occasional contact; and high (15.4%) - 77.8% handled waste, 81% smelled a strong odor, and 72.2% reported skin irritation. Two exposure groups were identified for the oil cleanup activities: low (73.1%) - 92.9% did not participate; and medium (26.9%) - all participated, 45.1% used contaminated instruments, 79.9% reported a strong odor, and 20% had frequent contact with the oil. The northern coast of Pernambuco had the highest percentage of individuals in the high-exposure group (17.1%). This group was formed predominantly of women. Fishers were exposed to oil both at work and while cleaning beaches, reefs, and mangroves, many with high exposure rates. These results underscore the need for strategies to monitor the physical and mental health of this population, as well as the assessment of bioindicators and the implementation of occupational and environmental health surveillance actions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.