Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41563269›Full record

ReviewRevista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical2026

Forecasting and Early Warning Systems for Dengue Outbreaks: Updated Narrative Review.

José Micael Ferreira da Costa, Alexandre Cunha Costa, Cleiton da Silva Silveira, Suellen Teixeira Nobre Gonçalves, Antonio Duarte Marcos Junior, Luciano Pamplona de Góes Cavalcanti

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

José Micael Ferreira da CostaUniversidade Federal do Ceará, Departamento de Engenharia Hidráulica e Ambiental, Fortaleza, CE, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0360-1963
Alexandre Cunha CostaUniversidade da Integração Internacional da Lusofonia Afro-Brasileira, Instituto de Engenharia e Desenvolvimento Sustentável, Redenção, CE, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4771-1382
Cleiton da Silva SilveiraUniversidade Federal do Ceará, Departamento de Engenharia Hidráulica e Ambiental, Fortaleza, CE, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3303-5157
Suellen Teixeira Nobre GonçalvesUniversidade Federal do Ceará, Departamento de Engenharia Hidráulica e Ambiental, Fortaleza, CE, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7675-156X
Antonio Duarte Marcos JuniorUniversidade Federal do Ceará, Departamento de Engenharia Hidráulica e Ambiental, Fortaleza, CE, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7015-1355
Luciano Pamplona de Góes CavalcantiUniversidade Federal do Ceará, Departamento de Saúde Comunitária, Fortaleza, CE, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3440-1182

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this review, we examine dengue outbreak prediction and warning systems, highlighting their methodologies, variables, key findings, and existing gaps in the literature. The study was conducted in five stages: a literature survey, definition of thematic scope and eligibility criteria, exploratory review, systematization and categorization of findings, critical analysis, and comparative narrative synthesis. We selected 14 articles on prediction and seven on warning systems, encompassing statistical models, machine learning, and deep learning, as well as systems applied in various countries, with a particular focus on Brazil. The results indicated that meteorological and climatic variables are the most frequently used, followed by epidemiological and entomological data. Models such as Random Forest and Long Short-Term Memory demonstrated superior predictive performance, especially for short-term forecasts of up to 1 week. Among the warning systems, classical methods, such as the Early Aberration Reporting System, offer simplicity and speed but provide shorter lead times. In contrast, systems such as EWARS-TDR and ADSEWS excel by integrating multiple data sources and providing longer lead times (up to 13 weeks). Despite considerable advancements, challenges related to data quality and availability, model replicability across different contexts, and implementation persist in public health systems.

Indexed as

DengueDisease OutbreaksAnimalsBrazilForecastingHumansPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning Models

Identifiers

PMID41563269
PMCPMC12810927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.