ReviewRevista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical2026
Forecasting and Early Warning Systems for Dengue Outbreaks: Updated Narrative Review.
Review in Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Arthralgia and fever as dominant predictors of Chikungunya confirmation: an explainable artificial intelligence approach.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this review, we examine dengue outbreak prediction and warning systems, highlighting their methodologies, variables, key findings, and existing gaps in the literature. The study was conducted in five stages: a literature survey, definition of thematic scope and eligibility criteria, exploratory review, systematization and categorization of findings, critical analysis, and comparative narrative synthesis. We selected 14 articles on prediction and seven on warning systems, encompassing statistical models, machine learning, and deep learning, as well as systems applied in various countries, with a particular focus on Brazil. The results indicated that meteorological and climatic variables are the most frequently used, followed by epidemiological and entomological data. Models such as Random Forest and Long Short-Term Memory demonstrated superior predictive performance, especially for short-term forecasts of up to 1 week. Among the warning systems, classical methods, such as the Early Aberration Reporting System, offer simplicity and speed but provide shorter lead times. In contrast, systems such as EWARS-TDR and ADSEWS excel by integrating multiple data sources and providing longer lead times (up to 13 weeks). Despite considerable advancements, challenges related to data quality and availability, model replicability across different contexts, and implementation persist in public health systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.