ArticleJACC. Case reports2026
Successful Extraction of Entrapped CIED Lead After TTVR.
Article in JACC. Case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement-a comparison of clinical and procedural outcomes of two different prostheses.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTranscatheter tricuspid valve replacement (TTVR) has emerged as a therapeutic option for patients with symptomatic severe tricuspid regurgitation. Right ventricular (RV) leads from pre-existing cardiac implantable electronic devices are entrapped during TTVR device implantation. CASE SUMMARY: An 83-year-old woman with a dual-chamber cardiac implantable electronic device underwent TTVR in 2022. The procedure resulted in entrapment of the RV lead. After TTVR, the increase in lead impedance raised concern for lead failure, prompting consideration of a leadless pacemaker. During this procedure, the entrapped lead was extracted without causing malposition of the TTVR device. DISCUSSION: Extraction of entrapped leads after TTVR may be feasible in experienced centers after cautious deliberation. Nevertheless, pre-emptive lead extraction should be considered to minimize the risk of unsuccessful extraction or serious complications. TAKE-HOME MESSAGE: Extraction of entrapped RV leads without causing TTVR device malposition may be feasible, and leadless pacemakers can be considered a technically viable alternative for RV pacing in TTVR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.