ArticleThe journal of trauma and acute care surgery2026
The ability of statewide prehospital pediatric blood transfusion protocols to predict early in-hospital blood product administration: A National Trauma Data Bank analysis.
Article in The journal of trauma and acute care surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe ability of statewide prehospital pediatric blood transfusion protocols to identify patients who receive early in-hospital blood transfusion is unknown. We aimed to characterize these protocols and compare their test characteristics.
methodsThe National Trauma Data Bank was used for this study. Pediatric (1-15 years of age) patients enrolled in the National Trauma Data Bank from 2017 to 2020 and transported by emergency medical services were analyzed. Components of available statewide transfusion protocols were abstracted by a single investigator using a standardized template. Test characteristics and associated 95% confidence intervals were calculated for each protocol using early in-hospital transfusion as the reference standard. We defined early transfusion as blood product administration within 4 hours of hospital arrival. Prehospital heart rate, systolic blood pressure, and Glasgow Coma Scale values were available in the data set. Shock index was calculated as heart rate/systolic blood pressure. Altered mental status (AMS) was defined as a Glasgow Coma Scale score of <15. Head injury was defined as an Abbreviated Injury Scale head score of >1. Intoxication was defined as a blood ethanol level of >80 mg/dL.
resultsOf the 78,430 patients analyzed, 2,125 (2.7%) received early transfusion. Four statewide prehospital transfusion protocols were included (Maryland [age-defined hypotension plus age-defined tachycardia or AMS without head injury or intoxication], West Virginia [at least two: systolic blood pressure < 70+ (2(age)); AMS without head injury; heart rate >130 beats per minute; shock index >1], Delaware [systolic blood pressure <70 mm Hg or elevated age-adjusted pediatric shock index], and Pennsylvania [age-defined hypotension or shock index >1 or AMS without head injury]). Test characteristics varied widely across protocols (Maryland: sensitivity of 8.0% [6.7-9.4%], specificity of 99.7% [99.6-99.7%]; West Virginia: sensitivity of 44.0% [41.1-46.9%], specificity of 86.9% [86.6-87.2%]; Delaware: sensitivity of 53.6% [51.2-55.9%], specificity of 81.2% [80.9-81.5%]; Pennsylvania: sensitivity of 58.7% [56.2-61.1%], specificity of 72.3% [72.0-72.7%]).
conclusionFew statewide prehospital pediatric transfusion protocols exist. Existing protocols have variable inclusion criteria with suboptimal and wide-ranging sensitivity and specificity for the outcome of early in-hospital transfusion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.