Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41563099›Full record

ReviewInfection and immunity2026

Dead but not gone: the interplay between the programmed cell death process and surrounding bacteria.

Sam Benson, Christopher J Anderson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Infection and immunity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sam BensonCentre for Inflammation Research, Institute for Regeneration and Repair, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0009-3136-7917
Christopher J AndersonCentre for Inflammation Research, Institute for Regeneration and Repair, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2600-0968

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 225923/Z/22/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell death is an integral part of homeostasis, removing damaged and infected cells and replenishing healthy cells. It is a process well understood from a host perspective, with clearly delineated pathways and an expansive literature as to how it interacts with other immune and tissue mechanisms. However, the interaction between cell death and the microbial community is less well explored. There is an understanding of how bacterial pathogens are able to induce death and can have a detrimental impact on tissue resolution and repair but little on how bacteria respond to homeostatic cell death or death caused by non-bacterial stimuli. This review will cover recent advances in the understanding of host-microbe communication during cell death and will discuss how bacteria modulate/are modulated by cell death-related phenomena. The interplay between the microbiota and the fundamental processes involved in host cell death presents an exciting opportunity to discover how modulation of host mechanisms can beneficially modulate the microbiota, and therefore concurrently offer potential routes to control a number of conditions that have been linked to aberrant microbiota composition, including inflammatory bowel disease and cancer.

Indexed as

ApoptosisBacteriaCell DeathHost-Pathogen InteractionsAnimalsEfferocytosisHumansMicrobiotaapoptosiscell deathefferocytosisferroptosisgut microbiotanecroptosisNETosisoral microbiotapyroptosis

Identifiers

PMID41563099
PMCPMC12890029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.