ArticlePediatric reports2026
Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis Guided by 3D Model and Monitored with Ultrasonography: A Case Report.
Article in Pediatric reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This case report describes mandibular distraction osteogenesis (DO) in a six-year-old patient with first and second branchial arch syndrome and obstructive sleep apnea, in whom 3D surgical planning was combined with ultrasonography (US) for postoperative monitoring. The aim was to illustrate how patient-specific 3D modeling and a structured ultrasonography protocol can support safe mandibular advancement while limiting radiation exposure in a pediatric patient with complex craniofacial deformity. Preoperatively, a 3D-printed model of the mandible, generated from a cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan, was used to guide precise osteotomy planning and vector orientation. The surgical procedure was conducted using a Risdon approach and piezoelectric tools to ensure minimal trauma. Postoperative monitoring incorporated serial panoramic radiography and US at predefined time points to assess gap size, callus formation, and vascularity during distraction and consolidation. US identified early callus formation, progressive cortical bridging, and preserved callus vascularity, and, together with radiographic findings, guided the timing of distraction termination and distractor removal at 16 weeks. This case adds to the limited literature on pediatric mandibular DO by demonstrating the feasibility of integrating patient-specific 3D virtual planning with US-based follow-up to improve the safety, precision, and radiation-conscious management of DO in pediatric patients with complex craniofacial deformities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.