Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41562990›Full record

ArticleMethods and protocols2026

A Study Protocol for Developing a Pragmatic Aetiology-Based Silicosis Prevention and Elimination Approach in Southern Africa.

Norman Nkuzi Khoza, Thokozani Patrick Mbonane, Phoka C Rathebe, Masilu Daniel Masekameni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Methods and protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Norman Nkuzi KhozaDepartment of Environmental Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Thokozani Patrick MbonaneDepartment of Environmental Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-5802-4265
Phoka C RathebeDepartment of Environmental Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-9095-354X
Masilu Daniel MasekameniDepartment of Development Studies, University of South Africa (UNISA), Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-5712-5291

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Workers' exposure to silica dust is a global occupational and public health concern and is particularly prevalent in Southern Africa, mainly because of inadequate dust control measures. It is worsened by the high prevalence of HIV/AIDS, which exacerbates tuberculosis and other occupational lung diseases. The prevalence of silicosis in the region ranges from 9 to 51%; however, silica dust exposure levels and controls, especially in the informal mining sector, particularly in artisanal small-scale mines (ASMs), leave much to be desired. This is important because silicosis is incurable and can only be eliminated by preventing worker exposure. Additionally, several studies have indicated inadequate occupational health and safety policies, weak inspection systems, inadequate monitoring and control technologies, and inadequate occupational health and hygiene skills. Furthermore, there is a near-absence of silica dust analysis laboratories in southern Africa, except in South Africa. This protocol aims to systematically evaluate the effectiveness of respirable dust and respirable crystalline silica dust exposure evaluation and control methodology for the mining industry. The study will entail testing the effectiveness of current dust control measures for controlling microscale particles using various exposure dose metrics, such as mass, number, and lung surface area concentrations. This will be achieved using a portable Fourier transform infrared spectroscope (FTIR) (Nanozen Industries Inc., Burnaby, BC, Canada), the Nanozen DustCount, which measures both the mass and particle size distribution. The surface area concentration will be analysed by inputting the particle size distribution (PSD) results into the Multiple-Path Particle Dosimetry Model (MPPD) to estimate the retained and cleared doses. The MPPD will help us understand the sub-micron dust deposition and the reduction rate using the controls. To the best of our knowledge, the proposed approach has never been used elsewhere or in our settings. The proposed approach will reduce dependence on highly skilled individuals, reduce the turnaround sampling and analysis time, and provide a reference for regional harmonised occupational exposure limit (OEL) guidelines as a guiding document on how to meet occupational health, safety and environment (OHSE) requirements in ASM settings. Therefore, the outcome of this study will influence policy reforms and protect hundreds of thousands of employees currently working without any form of exposure prevention or protection.

Indexed as

artisanal small-scale minesFourier transform infrared spectroscopyMultiple-Path Particle Dosimetry Modellingsilica dust

Identifiers

PMID41562990
PMCPMC12821596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.