ArticlePharmacy (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Structured Medication Review and Shared Decision-Making in Patients with Mild Intellectual Disabilities Who Use Psychotropic Medication.
Article in Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Experiences with shared decision-making in psychotropic medication for people with intellectual disabilities: perspectives of experts by experience, relatives, and support professionals.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- A protocol for application of OPTIMA-ID to identify potentially inappropriate prescribing in a cohort of older adults with intellectual disability.HRB open research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
People with intellectual disabilities frequently use psychotropic and other medications, sometimes inappropriately. To promote shared decision-making, they require accessible information about their medication. This study combined data from two similar intervention studies, conducted in two different settings, to assess the appropriateness of medication use and the shared decision-making process among adults with mild intellectual disabilities who used psychotropic medication. The intervention consisted of a structured, multidisciplinary medication review, including the provision of accessible psychotropic medication leaflets, and a discussion of the pharmacotherapeutic treatment plan with the patient by either a pharmacist or physician, depending on the setting. Outcomes included medication use, pharmacotherapeutic problems, implementation of recommendations, and perceived shared decision-making, measured with the Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire Q9. The 15 included participants used an average of nearly seven medications, which were mainly neurotropic, gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, and respiratory agents. On average, two pharmacotherapeutic problems were identified; the most common were overtreatment, side effects, and administration difficulties. Recommendations often involved dose reduction or tapering, and about 75% were fully or partially implemented. Both participants and clinicians reported high satisfaction with shared decision-making. Multidisciplinary, structured medication reviews, incorporating accessible medication leaflets, may enhance appropriate medication use and shared decision-making, but more research is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.