Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41562973›Full record

ArticlePharmacy (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Structured Medication Review and Shared Decision-Making in Patients with Mild Intellectual Disabilities Who Use Psychotropic Medication.

Gerda de Kuijper, Josien Jonker, Rien Hoge

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gerda de KuijperMental Healthcare Drenthe, Department Centre for Intellectual Disability and Mental Health, Middenweg 19, 9404 LL Assen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5315-2110
Josien JonkerMental Healthcare Drenthe, Department Centre for Intellectual Disability and Mental Health, Middenweg 19, 9404 LL Assen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7913-2967
Rien HogeWilhelmina Hospital Assen, Department Pharmacy, 9401 RK Assen, The Netherlands.

Funding

Zorgondersteuningsfonds, P. O. box 169, 37ZK Soesterberg, KPO-49
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

People with intellectual disabilities frequently use psychotropic and other medications, sometimes inappropriately. To promote shared decision-making, they require accessible information about their medication. This study combined data from two similar intervention studies, conducted in two different settings, to assess the appropriateness of medication use and the shared decision-making process among adults with mild intellectual disabilities who used psychotropic medication. The intervention consisted of a structured, multidisciplinary medication review, including the provision of accessible psychotropic medication leaflets, and a discussion of the pharmacotherapeutic treatment plan with the patient by either a pharmacist or physician, depending on the setting. Outcomes included medication use, pharmacotherapeutic problems, implementation of recommendations, and perceived shared decision-making, measured with the Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire Q9. The 15 included participants used an average of nearly seven medications, which were mainly neurotropic, gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, and respiratory agents. On average, two pharmacotherapeutic problems were identified; the most common were overtreatment, side effects, and administration difficulties. Recommendations often involved dose reduction or tapering, and about 75% were fully or partially implemented. Both participants and clinicians reported high satisfaction with shared decision-making. Multidisciplinary, structured medication reviews, incorporating accessible medication leaflets, may enhance appropriate medication use and shared decision-making, but more research is needed.

Indexed as

accessible medication leafletsintellectual disabilitiesmedication reviewmental healthpsychotropic medicationshared decision-making

Identifiers

PMID41562973
PMCPMC12821519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.