Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41562960›Full record

SynthesisAdvances in respiratory medicine2025

Efficacy of Carbocisteine in Reducing Exacerbations in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Chia Siang Kow, Syed Shahzad Hasan, Kaeshaelya Thiruchelvam

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Advances in respiratory medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chia Siang KowSchool of Pharmacy, Sunway University, Petaling Jaya 47500, Selangor, Malaysia.
Syed Shahzad HasanSunway Biofunctional Molecules Discovery Centre, Faculty of Medical and Life Sciences, Sunway University, Petaling Jaya 47500, Selangor, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-4058-2215
Kaeshaelya ThiruchelvamSchool of Applied Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield HD1 3DH, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3754-1690

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of carbocisteine in reducing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations based on evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov. RCTs comparing carbocisteine (1500 mg/day) with placebo in COPD patients, with a minimum follow-up of six months, were included. Data on exacerbation rates and adverse events were extracted and analyzed using a random-effects model. Four RCTs involving 1746 patients met inclusion criteria. Pooled analysis showed that carbocisteine significantly reduced the annual rate of acute exacerbations compared to placebo (WMD = -0.40; 95% CI: -0.69 to -0.11), with no significant increase in adverse events (OR = 1.02; 95% CI: 0.76 to 1.37). Mechanistically, carbocisteine improves mucociliary clearance, suppresses airway inflammation, reduces oxidative stress, and may hinder bacterial colonization. Carbocisteine is associated with a significant reduction in COPD exacerbations and demonstrates a favorable safety profile. It may serve as an effective adjunctive therapy in patients with frequent exacerbations and mucus hypersecretion.

Indexed as

CarbocysteineExpectorantsPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveDisease ProgressionHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicCarbocysteineExpectorantscarbocisteinechronic obstructive pulmonary disorderCOPDefficacy

Identifiers

PMID41562960
PMCPMC12821590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.