ReviewAdvances in respiratory medicine2025
Physical and Physiological Mechanisms of Emergent Hydrodynamic Pressure in High-Flow Nasal Cannula Therapy.
Review in Advances in respiratory medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy is frequently described as a positive pressure modality, yet this classification lacks mechanistic support. This critical narrative review integrates experimental, computational, and clinical evidence to examine the established physiological mechanisms underlying HFNC, with emphasis on precise terminology. The study clarifies that labeling HFNC as "positive pressure" is conceptually inaccurate, as the system delivers transient, flow-dependent pressures characteristic of open-circuit administration. Evidence is synthesized to quantify the relative contributions of nasopharyngeal dead-space clearance versus emergent pressure generation. Unlike CPAP, HFNC produces pressures ranging from 0.2 to 13.5 cmH
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.