Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41562955›Full record

ArticleVision (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Drawing and Soccer Tactical Memorization: An Eye-Tracking Investigation of the Moderating Role of Visuospatial Abilities and Expertise.

Sabrine Tlili, Hatem Ben Mahfoudh, Bachir Zoudji

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vision (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sabrine TliliLaboratoire de Recherche Sociétés & Humanités, DeVisu Department, Polytechnic University of Hauts-de-France, 59300 Valencienness, France.ORCID 0009-0009-3707-7785
Hatem Ben MahfoudhLaboratoire de Recherche Sociétés & Humanités, DeVisu Department, Polytechnic University of Hauts-de-France, 59300 Valencienness, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4704-8381
Bachir ZoudjiLaboratoire de Recherche Sociétés & Humanités, DeVisu Department, Polytechnic University of Hauts-de-France, 59300 Valencienness, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3436-764X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dynamic drawing has emerged as a strategy to communicate tactical diagrams, yet its effectiveness remains uncertain and appears to depend on individual differences. This study investigated how the memorization and visual processing of tactical soccer scenes are influenced by drawing format (static drawing vs. dynamic drawing) and moderated by visuospatial abilities (VSA) and expertise. Expert (N = 57) and novice (N = 54) participants were randomly assigned to one of two conditions. In the static drawing condition, participants viewed a pre-drawn, completed tactical diagram accompanied by an oral explanation. In the dynamic drawing condition, they observed the coach drawing the diagram in real time while delivering the same explanation. VSA was first assessed using a control test. Then, in the main test, participants memorized and reproduced the tactical scene while their eye movements were recorded using an eye tracker. Key findings revealed a three-way interaction, highlighting the occurrence of an expertise reversal effect: high VSA novices performed better with dynamic drawing, whereas low VSA experts benefited more from static drawing, showing distinct visual processing patterns across groups. Overall, the results highlight the need to tailor drawing strategies to individual characteristics, particularly VSA and expertise, to optimize visual attention and tactical memorization.

Indexed as

drawingexpertiseeye-trackingmemorizationvisuospatial abilities

Identifiers

PMID41562955
PMCPMC12821417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.