ArticleNeuroSci2026
Functional Connectivity Between Human Motor and Somatosensory Areas During a Multifinger Tapping Task: A Proof-of-Concept Study.
Article in NeuroSci, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hand representation maps of the primate primary motor (M1) and somatosensory (SI) cortices exhibit plasticity, with their spatial extent modifiable through training. While activation and map enlargement during tapping tasks are well documented, the directionality of information flow between these regions remains unclear. We applied Information Imbalance Gain Causality (IIG) to examine the propagation and temporal dynamic of BOLD activity among Area 4 (precentral gyrus), Area 3a (fundus of the central sulcus), and SI areas (postcentral gyrus). Data were collected from both hemispheres of nine participants performing alternating right-left hand finger tapping inside a 1.5T fMRI scan. The results revealed strong information flow from both the precentral and postcentral gyri toward the sulcus during tapping task, with weaker bidirectional exchange between the gyri. When not engaged in tapping, both gyri communicated with each other and the sulcus. During active tapping, flow bypassed the sulcus, favoring a more direct postcentral to precentral way. Overtime, postcentral to sulcus influence strengthened during non task periods, but diminished during tapping. These findings suggest that M1, Area 3a, and SI areas form a dynamic network that supports rapid learning processing, where Area 3a of the sulcus may contribute to maintaining representational plasticity during complex tapping tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.