Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41562834›Full record

ReviewNeuroSci2026

Evolution of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Treatment: A Narrative Review.

Đula Đilvesi, Bojan Jelača, Aleksandar Knežević, Željko Živanović, Veljko Pantelić, Jagoš Golubović

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in NeuroSci, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07724717 (Effects of Whole Wrist Versus Specific Carpal Bone Mobilization in the Patients of Carpel Tunnel Syndrome), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07724717 nacompletednot on this map

Effects of Whole Wrist Versus Specific Carpal Bone Mobilization in the Patients of Carpel Tunnel Syndrome

TypeinterventionalSponsorRiphah International UniversityRan2025 to 2026Enrolled44ConditionsCarpal Tunnel SyndromeArmsSpecific Bone Mobilization, Whole Wrist Mobilization, Standardized Physiotherapy Treatment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Đula ĐilvesiFaculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad, Hajduk Veljkova 3, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0003-3131-7855
Bojan JelačaFaculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad, Hajduk Veljkova 3, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0003-3243-3196
Aleksandar KneževićFaculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad, Hajduk Veljkova 3, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0002-9297-793X
Željko ŽivanovićFaculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad, Hajduk Veljkova 3, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia.
Veljko PantelićFaculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad, Hajduk Veljkova 3, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia.ORCID 0009-0008-1875-3592
Jagoš GolubovićFaculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad, Hajduk Veljkova 3, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0001-5524-246X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common peripheral nerve entrapment disorder, with a lifetime prevalence estimated at approximately 10%. This narrative review explores the historical evolution, current management strategies, and emerging trends in CTS diagnosis and treatment. Early recognition of CTS led to the development of conservative interventions, including splinting, corticosteroid injections, and physical therapy, aimed at alleviating median nerve compression and associated symptoms. The advent of open carpal tunnel release established surgery as the definitive treatment for moderate-to-severe CTS, with subsequent refinements-such as mini-open and endoscopic techniques-focused on minimizing tissue trauma and expediting recovery. Comparative studies demonstrate similar long-term efficacy between surgical modalities, though endoscopic approaches often provide faster short-term recovery. Advances in diagnostic imaging, including high-resolution ultrasound, have improved early detection and dynamic assessment of median nerve compression. Emerging therapies, such as regenerative biologics, neuromobilization, and minimally invasive surgical innovations, offer promising adjuncts to current care. Despite substantial progress, further research is needed to clarify optimal patient selection, refine minimally invasive techniques, and explore regenerative interventions. This review underscores the importance of individualized, evidence-based, and patient-centered approaches to CTS management, integrating both established and emerging strategies to optimize functional outcomes and quality of life.

Indexed as

carpal tunnel syndromecorticosteroid injectionendoscopic carpal tunnel releaseentrapment neuropathylong-term outcomesminimally invasive surgeryneuromobilizationopen carpal tunnel releasephysical therapyregenerative therapyultrasound diagnosiswrist splinting

Identifiers

PMID41562834
PMCPMC12821589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.