ArticleAntibodies (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Robustness Evaluation of a Legacy N-Glycan Profiling Method for a Therapeutic Antibody Under ICH Q14 Lifecycle Principles.
Article in Antibodies (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study assesses the robustness of a legacy N-glycan profiling method for the therapeutic antibody MAB1 with different Peptide-N-glycosidase F (PNGase F) enzyme sources, solid phase extraction (SPE) cartridges, and reagent stability, aligning with ICH Q14 lifecycle management principles. Glycosylation profiling is critical for therapeutic antibodies as it influences both function and pharmacokinetics.
methodThe legacy N-glycan profiling method, 2-aminobenzoic acid (2-AA) labeling combined with normal-phase HPLC, was re-evaluated to confirm consistent analytical performance in the context of evolving regulatory expectations. The evaluation focused on three key factors: PNGase F enzyme sources, solid-phase extraction (SPE) cartridges, and reagent stability.
resultsCommercial PNGase F enzymes showed various performances, with some sources yielding significant differences. Several SPE cartridges were also tested, with certain formats displaying poor recovery and high variability, particularly for sialylated glycans. In addition, reagent stability studies revealed rapid degradation of the labeling reagent within a few days.
conclusionsThese results underscore the importance of risk control, continual improvement, and lifecycle management to ensure reliable glycosylation analysis and the sustained robustness of legacy methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.