ReviewAntibodies (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Bispecific Antibodies: Strategies Available to Optimize Their Safe Delivery in Patients with Multiple Myeloma.
Review in Antibodies (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Safety and efficacy of bispecific antibodies in hematologic neoplasms: a systematic review.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- Multi-target-directed drugs: new additions in 2025 and post-marketing safety surveillance of drugs marketed in 2022-2024.Pharmacological reports : PR · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) have emerged as an important new class drugs for the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) over the last few years. Currently, BsAbs are only licensed for use as monotherapy in patients with relapsed/refractory MM who have had at least three prior lines of treatment and are triple class-exposed (patients who have received an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody, an immunodulatory drug, and a proteasome inhibitor). However, their use in earlier lines, including in the upfront setting, is being explored in multiple ongoing clinical trials with promising early results. The BsAbs have specific toxicities, including a high rate of low-grade cytokine release syndrome and, less commonly, immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome. These immune-related toxicities occur almost exclusively during the initiation phase of the BsAbs. This has led to frequent hospitalization of patients for the duration of the initial step-up dosing phase. Strategies that could facilitate outpatient step-up dosing, such as tocilizumab prophylaxis, will become even more critical if BsAbs move into earlier lines of treatment and are used in larger numbers of patients. Optimizing infection prophylaxis is critical for ensuring the safe delivery of BsAbs as infection is the leading cause of non-relapse mortality in patients being treated with BsAbs. Multiple strategies to minimize the infection risk, including antimicrobial prophylaxis, immunoglobulin replacement, vaccination and reduced dosing frequency, have been evaluated. The clinical data on the efficacy of these supportive measures are described in this review article alongside the available strategies for mitigating and managing CRS and ICANS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.