Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41562630›Full record

SynthesisClinical oral implants research2026

Diagnostic Accuracy of Deep Learning Models in Detecting Peri-Implant Marginal Bone Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Momen A Atieh, Maanas Shah, Abeer Hakam, Fawaghi AlAli, Samhar AlSayed, Andrew Tawse-Smith, Nabeel H M Alsabeeha

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical oral implants research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Momen A AtiehHamdan Bin Mohammed College of Dental Medicine, Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dubai Healthcare City, Dubai, UAE.ORCID 0000-0003-4019-9491
Maanas ShahHamdan Bin Mohammed College of Dental Medicine, Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dubai Healthcare City, Dubai, UAE.
Abeer HakamHamdan Bin Mohammed College of Dental Medicine, Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dubai Healthcare City, Dubai, UAE.
Fawaghi AlAliHamdan Bin Mohammed College of Dental Medicine, Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dubai Healthcare City, Dubai, UAE.
Samhar AlSayedHamdan Bin Mohammed College of Dental Medicine, Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dubai Healthcare City, Dubai, UAE.
Andrew Tawse-SmithSir John Walsh Research Institute, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Nabeel H M AlsabeehaDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Ajman University, Ajman, UAE.ORCID 0000-0003-2003-3494

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeri-implantitis is a common implant complication requiring early detection to prevent bone loss and implant failure. Deep learning models show promise for enhancing radiographic diagnosis.

objectivesThis review systematically evaluated the diagnostic performance of deep learning models in detecting peri-implant marginal bone loss on radiographic images. MATERIALS AND

methodsA comprehensive search of PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov, and ProQuest identified studies published between 2010 and July 2025. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed methodological quality using QUADAS-2. Diagnostic metrics, including sensitivity, specificity, F1-score, area under the curve (AUC), were synthesized using random-effects meta-analysis. Heterogeneity and publication bias were evaluated using I

resultsFive studies comprising 12,545 periapical and panoramic radiographs met inclusion criteria. Deep learning models achieved pooled sensitivity of 88%, specificity of 91%, and AUC of 0.95, indicating high diagnostic performance. Positive and negative likelihood ratios suggested strong clinical utility. Quality was generally good, though reporting of implant characteristics and data augmentation was inconsistent. Meta-regression revealed that dataset size and unit of analysis influenced accuracy, whereas imaging type did not. No publication bias was found.

conclusionDeep learning models demonstrate high accuracy in detecting radiographic marginal bone loss, potentially indicating peri-implantitis but cannot substitute for comprehensive clinical assessment. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These models offer a promising adjunct for radiographic detection of marginal bone loss, supporting clinicians in early diagnosis and timely interventions.

Indexed as

Alveolar Bone LossDeep LearningDental ImplantsPeri-ImplantitisHumansSensitivity and SpecificityDental Implantsdeep learning modelmeta‐analysisperi‐implantitissystematic review

Identifiers

PMID41562630
PMCPMC13051456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.