ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2026
The state of genetic counseling supervision worldwide: Challenges, practices, and pathways for the future.
Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Still Becoming: Global Reflections on the Future of the Genetic Counseling Profession.Journal of genetic counseling · 2026Article
- The state of genetic counseling supervision worldwide: Challenges, practices, and pathways for the future.Journal of genetic counseling · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genetic counseling supervision (GCS), a structured process in which a professional supports a supervisee through reflection, case discussion, and skills development, plays a crucial role in ensuring the quality and effectiveness of genetic counseling services worldwide. Despite its advantages, the implementation and consistency of GCS practices vary significantly across different regions, leading to disparities in the quality of genetic counseling services globally. The research was based on interviews with key professionals recognized as representatives of genetic counseling from diverse regions, including America, Europe, Asia, Africa, and Oceania. Data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis, identifying three overarching themes: (1) Historical and Structural Foundations of Access to GCS, including professional origins and institutional pathways, recognition of the profession, and policy, governance, and regulatory frameworks; (2) Meanings, Functions, and Perceived Value of GCS, encompassing its protective function against burnout, diversity of definitions and scope, and perceived contributions to practice quality; and (3) Forces Shaping the Implementation of GCS, covering genomics and increasing biomedical complexity, constraining pressures such as resources and workload, and enabling factors, such as networks, education, and digital solutions. These results indicate a promising shift toward broader recognition and integration of GCS, offering valuable insights for policymakers, genetic counselors and other healthcare professionals, and contributing to discussions on informed decision-making and international collaboration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.