Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41562370›Full record

ArticleMedical education2026

'I was a bit hasty … I was a young resident!' Medical residents' responses to clinical uncertainty.

Nicolas Belhomme, Alain Lescoat, Pierre Pottier, Yoann Launey, Emmanuel Triby, Thierry Pelaccia, François Robin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nicolas BelhommeService de Médecine Interne et Immunologie Clinique, CHU Rennes, Rennes, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9438-3350
Alain LescoatService de Médecine Interne et Immunologie Clinique, CHU Rennes, Rennes, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2081-8558
Pierre PottierService de Médecine Interne et Immunologie Clinique, CHU Nantes, Université de Nantes, Nantes, France.
Yoann LauneyRéanimation Chirurgicale, Département d'Anesthésie-Réanimation-Médecine Périopératoire, CHU Rennes, Université Rennes, Rennes, France.
Emmanuel TribyLaboratoire Interuniversitaire des Sciences de l'Éducation et de la Communication (LISEC), UR_2310, université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Thierry PelacciaLaboratoire Interuniversitaire des Sciences de l'Éducation et de la Communication (LISEC), UR_2310, université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
François RobinService de Rhumatologie, CHU Rennes, Rennes, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5134-8160

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionUncertainty is intrinsic to medical practice. Improving trainees' uncertainty tolerance requires exploring their responses to clinical uncertainty in clinical contexts. Although previous research works have highlighted the role of self-assessment, contextual cues and responsibility, existing models-developed for experienced physicians-often fail to capture residents' intuitive, situated responses. This study explores residents' behavioural responses to clinical uncertainty, focusing on how contextual features shape their actions and decision making. Following Hillen et al., we define behavioural responses as the actions individuals take to cope with uncertain situations.

methodsUsing an interpretative paradigm, we conducted a thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews with residents from several medical specialties. Considering that age, gender and clinical experience shape responses to uncertainty, we used a maximum variation sampling strategy to ensure diversity in year of residency and gender among participants. Audio-recorded interviews were conducted following a pretested interview guide focusing on residents' lived experiences of uncertainty and transcribed into verbatims. Analysis combined deductive coding, informed by Hillen's framework and Han's taxonomy, with inductive theme generation to capture novel insights.

resultsFourteen participants described three main behavioural responses to clinical uncertainty, aligned with Han's taxonomy: reducing uncertainty, protection and adaptation. Their responses were determined by situational determinants, including the patient, the problem at hand, the environment and their individual characteristics. Over time, participants progressed from avoiding uncertainty or relying on supervisors to taking a more systemic and situated approach, integrating a combination of complementary strategies to balance the objectives of patients and physicians. This approach fostered the development of competence in navigating complex clinical situations. DISCUSSION: Our study shows that uncertainty is a situated experience shaped by dynamic interactions between practitioners and context. Recognising this helps move beyond a purely cognitive view, framing uncertainty as a core competency developed through experiential learning and supported by adaptive strategies.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceInternship and ResidencyAdaptation, PsychologicalAdultDecision MakingFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleQualitative ResearchUncertainty

Identifiers

PMID41562370
PMCPMC13350472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.