Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41562331›Full record

GuidelineEndocrine-related cancer2026

NANETS Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of stage I-III rectal neuroendocrine tumors.

Hagen Kennecke, Ebrahim Delpassand, Seth Felder, Ferga Gleeson, Julie Hallet, David Horowitz, Martin Hyrcza, Bryson W Katona, Maria Kiely, Michelle Kim and 4 more

Abstract readPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in Endocrine-related cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Hagen KenneckeDivision of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3211-0656
Ebrahim DelpassandDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Excel Diagnostics & Nuclear Oncology Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Seth FelderDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgical Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Ferga GleesonDepartment of Gastroenterology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Julie HalletDepartment of Surgery, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5108-1072
David HorowitzDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Martin HyrczaDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Arnie Charbonneau Cancer Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Bryson W KatonaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Maria KielyColon and Rectal Surgery, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Michelle KimDepartment of Gastroenterology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Nadine MallakDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Vicky ParkinsDepartment of Endocrinology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Madhulika G VarmaDepartment of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Janice PasiekaDepartment of Surgical Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Well-differentiated rectal neuroendocrine tumors (rNETs) are among the most common NETs and account for approximately 12-27% of all gastrointestinal NETs in North America. Significant discrepancies persist in the management of NETs regarding surveillance strategies, staging modalities, high-risk features, and criteria for surgical intervention. This guideline updates current practices of stage I-III rectal NETs with the utilization of GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) methodology and Delphi method of consensus among leading experts in the North American region. We found that several technological advances, such as 68Ga- or 64Cu-DOTATATE SSTR PET/CT, and broad adoption of pelvic MRI have improved staging of rNETs, along with modified endoscopic mucosal and submucosal resection and full-thickness excision techniques that demonstrate efficacy and safety for resection. Pivotal long-term outcome studies provide insight into i) risk factors for regional lymph node metastasis, ii) the impact of R1 excision (endoscopic), iii) best practices for intermediate-sized rNETs (11-20 mm), and iv) risk in small rNETs (≤10 mm). Recommendations were developed upon evidence-based conclusions from the GRADE review to define the role of baseline staging with MRI, advanced endoscopy, and transanal endoscopic surgical methods appropriate for T1 rNETs, the role of salvage therapy in cases of R1 resection, and the consideration of pathologic variables to direct definitive treatment and surveillance. We conclude that advances in screening programs and imaging allow for improved detection and staging of rNETs, while long-term outcome studies can better direct patients toward evidence-based treatment management and rectal organ preservation through less radical resection methods.

Indexed as

Neuroendocrine TumorsRectal NeoplasmsHumansNeoplasm Stagingfollow-upguidelinesNANETSneuroendocrinerectalrectal NETstaging

Identifiers

PMID41562331
PMCPMC13138514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.