GuidelineEndocrine-related cancer2026
NANETS Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of stage I-III rectal neuroendocrine tumors.
Guideline in Endocrine-related cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Tumor count and risk of lymph node metastasis in multiple rectal neuroendocrine tumors: an individual-level pooled analysis.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Well-differentiated rectal neuroendocrine tumors (rNETs) are among the most common NETs and account for approximately 12-27% of all gastrointestinal NETs in North America. Significant discrepancies persist in the management of NETs regarding surveillance strategies, staging modalities, high-risk features, and criteria for surgical intervention. This guideline updates current practices of stage I-III rectal NETs with the utilization of GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) methodology and Delphi method of consensus among leading experts in the North American region. We found that several technological advances, such as 68Ga- or 64Cu-DOTATATE SSTR PET/CT, and broad adoption of pelvic MRI have improved staging of rNETs, along with modified endoscopic mucosal and submucosal resection and full-thickness excision techniques that demonstrate efficacy and safety for resection. Pivotal long-term outcome studies provide insight into i) risk factors for regional lymph node metastasis, ii) the impact of R1 excision (endoscopic), iii) best practices for intermediate-sized rNETs (11-20 mm), and iv) risk in small rNETs (≤10 mm). Recommendations were developed upon evidence-based conclusions from the GRADE review to define the role of baseline staging with MRI, advanced endoscopy, and transanal endoscopic surgical methods appropriate for T1 rNETs, the role of salvage therapy in cases of R1 resection, and the consideration of pathologic variables to direct definitive treatment and surveillance. We conclude that advances in screening programs and imaging allow for improved detection and staging of rNETs, while long-term outcome studies can better direct patients toward evidence-based treatment management and rectal organ preservation through less radical resection methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.