Article in Nucleic acids research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Megan BillerDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC 28223, United States.
Sara KabirDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC 28223, United States.
Sarah NipperDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC 28223, United States.
Sydney AllenDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC 28223, United States.
Yara KayaliDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC 28223, United States.
Skyler KuncikDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC 28223, United States.
Hiroyuki SasanumaDepartment of Genome Medicine, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science, Tokyo 156-8506, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2824-4499
Pei ZhouDepartment of Biochemistry, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, United States.
Cyrus VaziriDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, United States.
Junya TomidaDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC 28223, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0813-5757
Funding
A Novel Carcinogen-Induced Cell Cycle CheckpointR01ES009558 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI VAZIRI, CYRUS · 2002 to 2016
$4.8M
Defining Mechanisms of Pathological Trans-Lesion Synthesis During CarcinogenesisR01CA215347 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI VAZIRI, CYRUS, WILLIAMS, SCOTT E · 2018 to 2022
$2.6M
Establishing MAGE-A4/RAD18 as a novel cancer-specific chemotherapeutic targetR01CA229530 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI PEARCE, KENNETH HUGH, VAZIRI, CYRUS · 2019 to 2023
$2.0M
Defining novel roles of the DNA repair factor REV7 in p53 signaling and regulationR15CA305114 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE · PI TOMIDA, JUNYA · 2025 to 2025
$545k
Synergistic DNA repair genes and sensitivity to radiation therapy in prostate cancerR15CA263784 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE · PI TOMIDA, JUNYA · 2021 to 2021
$447k
Astellas Research FoundationJapan Society for the Promotion of Science 19H04267Mitsubishi ResearchNaito ResearchNCI NIH HHS R01 CA215347NCI NIH HHS R01 CA229530NCI NIH HHS R15 CA263784NCI NIH HHS R15 CA305114NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES009558NIH HHS 1R15CA263784NIH HHS 1R15CA305114NIH HHS CA215347NIH HHS CA229530NIH HHS R01 ES009558Takeda Bioscience Research
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
Ataxia-telangiectasia mutated and RAD3-related (ATR) and its partner ATR-interacting protein (ATRIP) function as a critical proximal sensor and transducer of the DNA damage response (DDR). Several ATR substrates, including p53 and CHK1, are crucial for the coordination of cell cycle phase transitions, transcription, and DNA repair when cells sustain DNA damage. While much is known about ATR activation mechanisms, it is less clear how ATR signaling is negatively regulated in cells. Here, we identify the DNA repair protein REV7 as a novel direct binding partner of ATRIP. We define a REV7-interaction motif in ATRIP, which, when mutated, abrogates the REV7-ATRIP interaction in vitro and in intact cells. Using in vitro kinase assays, we show that REV7 inhibits ATR-mediated phosphorylation of its substrates, including p53. Disruption of the REV7-ATRIP interaction also enhances phosphorylation of CHK1 at Ser317 in intact cells. Taken together, our results establish REV7 as a critical negative regulator of ATR signaling. REV7 has pleiotropic roles in multiple DDR pathways, including Translesion Synthesis, DNA double-strand break resection, and p53 stability and may play a central role in the integration of multiple genome maintenance pathways.
Indexed as
Adaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsCell Cycle ProteinsDNA-Binding ProteinsCheckpoint Kinase 1DNA RepairHumansPhosphorylationProtein KinasesSignal TransductionTumor Suppressor Protein p53Adaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsATRIP protein, humanATR protein, humanCell Cycle ProteinsCheckpoint Kinase 1CHEK1 protein, humanDNA-Binding ProteinsProtein KinasesTumor Suppressor Protein p53
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
REV7 associates with ATRIP and inhibits ATR kinase activity. · full record | OpenQuestion