ArticleThe veterinary quarterly2026
Machine learning-assisted detection of canine mammary tumors using serum autoantibody signatures.
Article in The veterinary quarterly, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Radiomics: Current Applications and Future Directions.MedComm · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Canine mammary tumors (CMTs) are the most common neoplasms in intact female dogs, yet early detection remains challenging due to the lack of clinically validated, noninvasive biomarkers. This study aimed to develop a noninvasive diagnostic model for CMT detection by integrating serum autoantibody biomarkers with machine learning. Serum samples from 154 dogs with mammary tumors (31 benign, 123 malignant) and 39 healthy controls were analyzed using a custom multiplex immunoassay detecting autoantibodies against AGR2, HAPLN1, IGFBP5, and TYMS, normalized to anti-BSA levels. Median fluorescence intensity (MFI), standardized autoantibody ratios, and their combination, together with clinical variables, were used to train random forest classifiers. The model based on standardized autoantibody ratios achieved the best performance, with an AUC of 0.79 (sensitivity 75.3%, specificity 74.4%) for overall CMT detection; 0.78 (92.7%, 61.5%) for malignant CMTs; and 0.77 (82.2%, 71.8%) for early-stagemalignancies. Assuming a CMT prevalence of 0.5 in the hospital-referred population, the positive and negative predictive values ranged from 0.74-0.75 and 0.75-0.91, respectively. This proof-of-concept study demonstrates that a machine learning-assisted multiplex autoantibody assay offers a feasible noninvasive approach for CMT detection. Further validation in larger, independent cohorts is warranted to support clinical translation in veterinary oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.