ArticleJSES international2026
Do patients trust the tech? Exploring perception, confidence, and knowledge of innovations in shoulder arthroplasty.
Article in JSES international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Patient Education for innovative technology in shoulder arthroplasty: does knowledge improve outcomes?Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: As surgical technologies, such as three-dimensional preoperative planning, computer navigation, and augmented reality, become increasingly utilized in shoulder arthroplasty, questions remain about their value from the patient's perspective. While education and patient interest have driven demand and technology adoption in hip and knee arthroplasty, their role in shoulder procedures remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate patient perceptions of innovative technologies in shoulder arthroplasty and assess whether preoperative education influences confidence, satisfaction, and expectations. Methods: In this prospective observational study, 87 patients scheduled to undergo shoulder arthroplasty at a single institution completed a preoperative survey assessing demographics, baseline familiarity with surgical technologies, and perceptions of surgeon use of innovative tools prior to seeing their provider. Following this, patients then viewed a standardized educational video on the role of technology in shoulder arthroplasty. Postvideo responses measured changes in confidence, satisfaction, and outcome expectations. Statistical analysis included paired t-tests and analysis of variance to evaluate prepost changes and demographic associations. Results: Over half of patients (56.3%) were unfamiliar with innovative technologies at baseline, yet 60.9% reported increased confidence in surgeons using it. Most patients (66.7%) preferred the use of advanced planning technologies, though only 41.5% would choose a low-volume surgeon using these tools over a high-volume surgeon using conventional techniques. Improvements in confidence were significantly correlated with higher education and income levels (r = 0.31, Conclusion: Targeted preoperative education on surgical technology may improve patient confidence, strengthen perceptions of surgeon competency, and elevate expectations of care. While enthusiasm for advanced tools was observed following education, broader adoption may still be influenced by cost and accessibility. These findings support the role of brief, technology-focused education in enhancing the overall patient experience in shoulder arthroplasty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.