ArticleJSES international2026
Longitudinal analysis of rotator cuff repair: joint kinematics and clinical outcomes.
Article in JSES international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Rotator cuff repair is a common surgical procedure, but postoperative outcomes can be highly variable, and postoperative repair tissue healing remains a significant clinical challenge. Furthermore, the biomechanical effects of rotator cuff repair are not fully understood. Methods: Twenty-two participants scheduled for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were evaluated preoperatively and at 3, 12, and 24 months postsurgery. The following data were recorded at each time point: glenohumeral and scapulothoracic kinematics, shoulder strength, and patient-reported measures of pain and function. Postoperative repair integrity was assessed via magnetic resonance imaging at 3 months and 24 months postsurgery. Results: At 3 months postsurgery, 5 of 20 patients were identified as having a recurrent tear. An additional 4 patients had a recurrent tear at 24 months postsurgery. The center of contact of the humerus on the glenoid gradually shifted superiorly on the glenoid during the 24 month follow-up period ( Conclusion: Surgical rotator cuff repair was associated with decreased pain and improved subjective assessments of function within the first 3 months after surgery, and increased shoulder strength over 12- 24 months postsurgery. The study also found subtle changes over time in glenohumeral joint and scapulothoracic motion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.